ML-Based RACH Carrier Selection Under Changing Channel Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in accurately selecting uplink carriers for random access channel procedures due to infrequent evaluation of reference signal reserve power, leading to suboptimal carrier selection based on outdated channel conditions.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive carrier selection using machine learning models that monitor channel conditions during random access channel attempts to generate predictions for selecting the most likely successful carrier, allowing for dynamic switching and early radio link failure declaration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional carrier selection methods are used based on infrequent reference signal reserve power evaluation, then device complexity is reduced, but carrier selection accuracy deteriorates due to outdated channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier selection accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic carrier selection by continuously monitoring channel conditions during RACH attempts and using machine learning models to adapt carrier choices in real-time, transforming the static carrier selection process into a dynamic one that responds to changing wireless conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where channel conditions are monitored during RACH attempts, ML models predict successful carriers based on this feedback, and subsequent RACH attempts use these predictions, creating a continuous improvement cycle that enhances selection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If machine learning models are deployed for adaptive carrier selection, then random access success rate is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access success rateVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary channel condition monitoring and ML model predictions before executing RACH attempts, preparing carrier selection decisions in advance based on analyzed channel data, which improves success rates by avoiding reactive carrier selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The device autonomously performs channel monitoring, data collection, ML model execution, and carrier selection without external intervention, enabling the system to self-optimize carrier choices based on observed channel conditions and improve its own reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If channel conditions are monitored frequently during each RACH attempt, then carrier selection accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel condition monitoring accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors channel conditions continuously during RACH attempts (excessive action) to gather comprehensive data for ML model training, while using these models to reduce the number of actual RACH attempts needed, thereby compensating for the increased monitoring energy through reduced transmission energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260040360A1Adaptive carrier selection for random access channel procedures using machine learning
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20260040360A1 patent drawing
  • US20260040360A1 patent drawing
  • US20260040360A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. In some examples, a UE may select a carrier from a plurality of configured carriers for a random access channel (RACH) procedure on a cell using a machine learning model. The UE may monitor parameters during each RACH attempt of the RACH procedure to determine a channel dataset associated with the cell. Based on a channel dataset for a current RACH procedure, the ML model may predict a likelihood of successfully performing a RACH procedure for each carrier. The UE 115 may select a carrier based on the prediction and may perform the RACH procedure. In some examples, the UE may switch carriers after failing a quantity of RACH attempts of the RACH procedure. Additionally, or alternatively, the UE may declare an early radio link failure based on failing the quantity of RACH attempts and the prediction.