ML Resource Allocation for Worker-Task Matching Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industries face challenges in efficiently matching the right worker with the right activity and equipment requirements, particularly in field work, to ensure safe operation and effective task completion, as existing methods lack predictive capabilities for long-term personnel alignment and risk mitigation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system for resource monitoring and allocation recommendation that uses cognitive analysis to determine the confidence level of task completion by assessing available and assigned resources, ranking resource scenarios, and generating recommendations for optimal resource allocation based on skill sets and situational factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional resource assignment methods are used, then simplicity of operation is maintained, but accuracy of matching workers with task requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of matchingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual or rule-based resource assignment mechanisms with a machine learning-based cognitive system. The system uses trained models that analyze worker profiles, task requirements, and historical performance data to automatically generate optimal resource assignments, substituting mechanical decision-making processes with intelligent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a cognitive system as an intermediary between task requirements and resource allocation decisions. This intermediary layer processes multiple data sources including worker skills, availability, historical performance, and task constraints to generate optimized assignments, acting as a mediator that transforms raw data into actionable resource allocation recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of task completion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where the cognitive system monitors task progress, resource performance, and completion status in real-time. This feedback is fed back into the machine learning models to dynamically adjust resource assignments and provide early warnings for potential task failures, enabling proactive reliability management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary risk assessment and resource optimization before task execution begins. The cognitive system analyzes historical data and current conditions to predict potential issues and pre-arrange optimal resource allocations, preventing problems before they occur rather than merely reacting to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual resource allocation is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the resource allocation system to serve itself by using machine learning models that automatically learn from historical data and improve assignments without constant human intervention. The cognitive system autonomously analyzes data patterns, generates optimization recommendations, and can automatically implement resource reallocations based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts multiple parameters including worker availability, skill levels, task priorities, and resource constraints to optimize productivity. The machine learning system continuously evaluates and modifies these parameters based on changing conditions, enabling adaptive resource allocation that maximizes productivity rather than relying on static manual assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11657345B2Implementing machine learning to identify, monitor and safely allocate resources to perform a current activity
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11657345B2 patent drawing
  • US11657345B2 patent drawing
  • US11657345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach to resource monitoring and allocation recommendation, a computer determines a work activity for a risk assessment. A computer determines one or more resources assigned to the work activity. A computer determines one or more current activities associated with the one or more resources assigned to the work activity. Based on the one or more resources assigned to the work activity and on the one or more current activities associated with the one or more resources assigned to the work activity, a computer determines a confidence level associated with successful completion of the work activity. A computer determines the confidence level does not exceed a pre-defined threshold. A computer determines one or more resource scenarios to improve the confidence level. A computer ranks the one or more resource scenarios. A computer generates a resource allocation recommendation based on the ranked one or more resource scenarios.