Machine Learning ROP Optimization for Drilling Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling technologies face challenges in efficiently projecting and controlling optimal drilling parameters such as rate of penetration (ROP), weight-on-bit (WOB), and rotations-per-minute (RPM) due to variable subterranean formation conditions, leading to suboptimal drilling performance.

Innovation Solution

A process that generates synthetic data using a data generation model, combines it with real-time data to form combined data, and uses a trained ROP model for stochastic optimization to project and control WOB and RPM, employing models like non-linear, deep neural networks, and recurrent generative adversarial networks for real-time closed-loop control of drilling tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If real-time automated closed-loop control is implemented using machine learning models, then drilling efficiency and rate of penetration are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of penetrationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control systems with machine learning models (neural networks, random forests) that process sensor data to predict optimal drilling parameters. The ML models substitute for complex mechanical control mechanisms, enabling automated decision-making based on formation conditions without requiring overly complex mechanical adjustment systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer between sensor data collection and drilling control actions. Machine learning models serve as intermediaries that process real-time sensor measurements (ROP, WOB, RPM) and formation condition data to predict optimal parameters, bridging the gap between data collection and control execution without direct mechanical coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple data sources and machine learning models are integrated for real-time optimization, then drilling performance is improved, but data processing requirements and computational energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling performanceVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training machine learning models using historical drilling data and formation condition information before actual drilling operations. The models are trained in advance to recognize patterns and predict optimal parameters, so that during real-time drilling, the computational burden is reduced as the models can quickly make predictions based on pre-learned relationships rather than processing all data from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of computational complexity to different aspects of the drilling control problem. Simple sensor data processing and real-time predictions use lightweight models, while comprehensive formation condition analysis and long-term optimization use more complex models. This localized application of computational resources optimizes the balance between drilling performance and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If real-time sensor data processing is performed to optimize drilling parameters, then drilling efficiency is improved, but measurement precision requirements and sensor complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidsensor precision requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensor measurements (ROP, WOB, RPM) with formation condition data from various sources into a unified predictive model. By combining these data types, the system can compensate for individual sensor limitations through cross-validation and complementary information, reducing the precision requirements for any single sensor while maintaining overall measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates virtual copies or representations of formation conditions through machine learning models that infer subsurface properties from surface sensor data. Instead of requiring direct precise measurement of all formation parameters, the system uses sensor data to create predictive models that replicate formation characteristics, reducing the need for high-precision sensors for every parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11873707B2Rate of penetration optimization for wellbores using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US11873707B2 patent drawing
  • US11873707B2 patent drawing
  • US11873707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for controlling a drilling tool inside a wellbore makes use of projection of optimal rate of penetration (ROP) and optimal controllable parameters such as weight-on-bit (WOB), and rotations-per-minute (RPM) for drilling operations. Optimum controllable parameters for drilling optimization can be predicted using a data generation model to produce synthesized data based on model physics, an ROP model, and stochastic optimization. The synthetic data can be combined with real-time data to extrapolate the data across the WOB and RPM space. The values for WOB an RPM can be controlled to steer a drilling tool. Examples of models used include a non-linear model, a linear model, a recurrent generative adversarial network (RGAN) model, and a deep neural network model.