ML Sales Order Fulfillment Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sales order fulfillment systems often provide inaccurate delivery dates, leading to customer dissatisfaction, increased costs for both sellers and customers, and inventory management challenges, as they fail to predict delays effectively.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that extracts features from historical sales data to train classifiers and regression models, predicting delivery delays and generating accurate predicted delivery dates by analyzing factors such as inventory availability, production schedules, and shipping complexities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to provide delivery dates, then the system is simple to operate, but the delivery date accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery date accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/manual delivery date estimation with a machine learning-based predictive system. The system uses ML models that process historical data, inventory information, production schedules, and shipping constraints to automatically generate accurate delivery date predictions, eliminating the need for manual estimation while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between raw data (historical orders, inventory levels, production schedules) and delivery date predictions. The ML models act as a mediator that processes complex relationships between multiple factors and outputs accurate delivery date estimates, bridging the gap between data and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If inaccurate delivery dates are provided, then the system operation is easier, but customer trust and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer trustVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring actual delivery performance against predicted dates and using this information to retrain and refine the machine learning models. This feedback loop ensures the system learns from past performance and improves its accuracy over time, thereby enhancing customer trust while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning system performs self-improvement by automatically analyzing historical performance data and adjusting its predictions without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by continuously optimizing its own accuracy through automated model retraining, maintaining high reliability while keeping the user interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If delivery dates are optimized for accuracy, then inventory management improves, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory management efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing historical data, inventory information, and production schedules in optimized formats. The machine learning models are pre-trained on this prepared data, allowing for efficient real-time predictions without requiring extensive computational resources during actual delivery date calculations, thus improving inventory management while controlling energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes computational resource usage by dynamically adjusting model parameters and data processing granularity based on the complexity of the prediction task. The system can switch between different levels of computational detail depending on the urgency and complexity of the delivery date prediction, balancing inventory management accuracy with energy and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240273442A1Machine Learning Based Sales Order Fulfilment Prediction
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20240273442A1 patent drawing
  • US20240273442A1 patent drawing
  • US20240273442A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments predict a sales order fulfillment of an item. Embodiments receive historical data including past sales orders, and extracts a plurality of machine learning (“ML”) features from the historical data. Embodiments use a portion of the plurality of ML features to train one or more classifiers and generate labeled ML features from the trained classifiers. Embodiments train a ML regression model with the extracted ML features and the labeled ML features. Embodiments then receive a new sales order and generate a prediction on a delivery date for the new sales order using the trained ML regression model.