Machine-Learning Search Refinement Using User Feedback Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional search techniques often fail to provide desired results due to improper use of search criteria and correlation of terms, leading to the provision of irrelevant information, wasting resources and user time.

Innovation Solution

A refined search method using machine learning to select and alter search criteria based on user interactions and preferences, allowing for improved search results through user feedback and machine learning adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional search algorithms use complex criteria to tailor search results, then search result relevance is improved, but search accuracy deteriorates due to improper use and correlation of terms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidsearch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where user interactions with search results (clicks, selections, refinements) are captured and used to adjust search criteria weighting. The system learns from user behavior patterns to improve term correlation and criteria application, resolving the contradiction between using complex criteria for relevance while maintaining accuracy through continuous refinement based on actual user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The search system dynamically adjusts search criteria weights and correlations based on real-time user interactions and historical data. Rather than using static complex algorithms, the system adapts term importance and criteria application dynamically, allowing it to maintain both relevance through complexity and accuracy through adaptability to specific user contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If search engines provide detailed tailored results based on multiple criteria, then information completeness is improved, but user time consumption deteriorates due to inability to quickly identify desired results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiduser time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments search results into hierarchical levels and categories based on user selections and interaction patterns. By organizing comprehensive information into structured segments, the system maintains information completeness while enabling users to quickly navigate and identify desired results without being overwhelmed by undifferentiated detailed information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and organizing search criteria and results based on historical user behavior and selection patterns. Search results are pre-segmented and weighted according to likely user preferences, so when users perform searches, they receive already-organized comprehensive information that reduces their time to find desired results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If search algorithms use prior user actions as search criteria, then search personalization is improved, but search reliability deteriorates when prior actions do not reflect current user needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch personalizationVSAvoidsearch result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of personalization based on user feedback and current search context. The system continuously evaluates whether prior user actions remain relevant to current search needs and adjusts the weight of historical criteria accordingly, maintaining personalization adaptability while ensuring reliability by down-weighting or discarding outdated contextual information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

User feedback on search results (selections, refinements, corrections) is captured and used to adjust the influence of prior user actions on current search criteria. The system learns when historical behavior patterns remain valid and when they should be overridden, resolving the contradiction between personalization through prior actions and reliability when those actions no longer reflect current needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12524476B2Refined search with machine learning
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12524476B2 patent drawing
  • US12524476B2 patent drawing
  • US12524476B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document describes techniques and devices for a refined search with machine learning. These techniques improve computer-aided searches through enabling selection of search criteria used in a prior search and providing a refined search result based on that selection. Furthermore, a machine-learning component of a search engine can be altered to improve future search results based on the selection and an indication of the desirability of the refined search result.