Two-Tiered ML Architecture for Network Settlement Time Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems lack mechanisms to determine hard disk speed of receiving computers and network routes, making it difficult to predict communication completion times across disparate computer networks due to unknown factors and biases in existing prediction methods.

Innovation Solution

A two-tiered machine learning architecture is employed to predict communication settlement times by determining probabilities of various factors independently and aggregating them to select a rule set based on current network conditions, preventing bias and improving prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional prediction methods are used, then prediction simplicity is maintained, but prediction accuracy deteriorates due to unknown factors and biases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction system is divided into multiple independent components: a first machine learning model that predicts network conditions, a second machine learning model that predicts communication settlement time, and an aggregation layer that combines their outputs. This segmentation allows each model to focus on specific factors, improving overall prediction accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aggregation layer acts as an intermediary between the two machine learning models and the final prediction output. It receives predictions from both models, combines them according to weighted rules, and produces the final settlement time prediction. This intermediary structure enables accurate integration of multiple prediction sources while maintaining system organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time network condition data is collected from multiple sources, then prediction reliability is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Network condition data from multiple sources (network devices, computers, storage devices) is processed by separate machine learning models rather than a single complex system. The first model handles network condition predictions while the second model handles settlement time predictions, allowing specialized processing that improves reliability without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning models automatically process and interpret network condition data from multiple sources without requiring manual intervention. The models self-adjust to account for biases and uncertainties in the data, improving prediction reliability while reducing the operational complexity of data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple factors are considered in prediction, then prediction comprehensiveness is improved, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction comprehensivenessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive prediction is achieved by segmenting the analysis into two focused models: one for network conditions and one for settlement time. Each model processes a subset of factors relevant to its specific prediction task, achieving comprehensiveness through coordinated specialization rather than single-model omniscience, thus reducing overall computational energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12136050B2System and methods for prediction communication performance in networked systems
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
  • US12136050B2 patent drawing
  • US12136050B2 patent drawing
  • US12136050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems for predicting communication settlement times across disparate networks store a first tier of a machine learning architecture comprising multiple machine learning models and an aggregation layer; store a second tier comprising rule sets for predicting settlement times; receive multiple data feeds corresponding to multiple communication data types; generate feature inputs based on the data feeds; input the feature inputs into the respective models to generate respective outputs; generate, using the aggregation layer, a third feature input based on the outputs; determine, based on the third feature input, a first rule set for predicting settlement times; receive a communication; predict a settlement time based on the first rule set; determine an aggregated communication load at a first time based on the settlement time; determine a performance availability requirement based on the load; determine a recommendation based on the performance availability requirement; and generate the recommendation based on the settlement time.