Machine Learning Structural Damage Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting structural damage from natural disasters like earthquakes are inefficient, leading to delayed response efforts and inaccurate damage assessment, as they rely on manual processes and lack real-time, accurate data dissemination.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning algorithms, combined with performance-based earthquake engineering, to quickly estimate damage by analyzing features such as structure type, shaking intensity, and soil characteristics, providing real-time damage assessments through a user-friendly interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used for damage assessment, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual damage assessment processes with an automated machine learning-based system. The system uses algorithms (such as random forests, neural networks, or support vector machines) to automatically analyze building characteristics, earthquake parameters, and structural data to predict damage levels, eliminating the need for manual inspection and significantly improving assessment speed and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of the physical assessment process by using machine learning algorithms that replicate and extend human expert judgment. The algorithm learns from training data containing building characteristics, earthquake parameters, and actual damage outcomes to produce predictions that mirror and surpass manual assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If real-time data processing is implemented, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing building characteristics, structural data, and earthquake parameters in databases before actual damage assessment is needed. The machine learning models are trained in advance on historical data, allowing them to make rapid, accurate predictions during actual earthquake events without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex real-time manual analysis with automated machine learning algorithms that can rapidly process data and produce accurate damage predictions. The system uses algorithms such as random forests, neural networks, or support vector machines that efficiently handle large datasets and provide precise results in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive feature analysis is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-identifying and storing relevant building features and earthquake parameters in structured databases. The machine learning models are pre-configured with the most predictive features (such as building age, construction material, structural type, and earthquake intensity), allowing rapid retrieval and analysis during actual assessment without time-consuming feature selection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming complex structural and earthquake data into standardized numerical parameters that machine learning algorithms can process efficiently. The system converts qualitative building characteristics into quantitative features and normalizes earthquake parameters, enabling fast computation while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10740684B1Method and system to predict the extent of structural damage
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 GREY RHINO INC
  • US10740684B1 patent drawing
  • US10740684B1 patent drawing
  • US10740684B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer programs are presented for predicting the scale and scope of damage after an earthquake. One method includes an operation for identifying a plurality of features, each feature being correlated to an indication of structural damage caused to a structure by an earthquake. The method further includes performing machine learning, using one or more hardware processors, to analyze destruction caused by one or more earthquakes to obtain a damage-estimation algorithm. The machine learning is based on the identified plurality of features. Further, the method includes operations for accessing shaking data for a new earthquake, and for estimating, using the one or more hardware processors, earthquake damage at a block level for a geographical region utilizing the damage-estimation algorithm and the shaking data. Further, the earthquake damage at the block level is presented, on a display screen, in a map of at least part of the geographical region.