Machine Learning Student Classification for Financial Card Incentives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional financial card incentive systems fail to provide tailored rewards to specific user categories, particularly students, who often do not use credit cards for large purchases due to limited credit limits, leading to missed opportunities for increased credit scores and higher credit limits.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models, specifically a neural network, to classify users as students or non-students based on transaction data and user similarity data, offering higher rewards for education-related purchases during predetermined periods, thereby incentivizing students to use their credit cards for larger purchases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional financial card incentive systems are used, then the system complexity is low, but the adaptability to specific user categories (students) is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to student usersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments users into different categories (students, non-students) using machine learning classification models. It divides the reward structure into different tiers: standard rewards for all users and enhanced rewards specifically for students making education-related purchases. This segmentation enables targeted adaptability to student users while maintaining a manageable system architecture through automated classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs automated machine learning models that automatically classify users and determine eligibility for enhanced rewards without manual intervention. The neural network and classification algorithms self-process transaction data, merchant information, and user profiles to autonomously identify student users and apply appropriate reward structures, reducing the need for complex manual configuration while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If equal rewards are given to all purchases, then the system operation is simple, but the incentive effectiveness for student categories is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincentive effectivenessVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different reward qualities to different local contexts: standard reward rates for general purchases and enhanced reward rates specifically for education-related purchases by student users. The classification model identifies local patterns in transaction data (merchant categories, purchase types) and applies appropriately weighted rewards, thereby increasing incentive effectiveness for the student category while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reward structure is made dynamic through automated adjustment based on real-time classification results. When the machine learning model identifies a student user making an education purchase, the system dynamically applies enhanced reward rates. This dynamic adaptation increases incentive effectiveness without requiring manual operational changes, as the system self-adjusts based on the classified user profile and transaction characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If manual classification of student users is used, then the classification accuracy can be controlled, but the processing speed is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification speedVSAvoidstudent classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual classification processes with automated machine learning models, specifically neural networks and classification algorithms. These models process transaction data, user profiles, and merchant information automatically at high speed while maintaining high classification accuracy. The mechanical substitution of manual review with automated computational classification simultaneously achieves fast processing and precise student identification through trained models that recognize patterns in the data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12190344B2Systems and methods for automatically providing customized financial card incentives
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12190344B2 patent drawing
  • US12190344B2 patent drawing
  • US12190344B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed embodiments may include a method for automatically providing customized financial card incentives where the system can identify if a transaction is eligible for additional bonus rewards by determining if the user is a student using a clustering algorithm with user similarity data to generate a probability. Then, if the probability is above a predetermined threshold, a machine learning model with comprehensive user data classifies the user as a student or non-student. Once the user is determined to be a student, the transaction is verified as being an educational purchase using the transaction data or by having the user provide an image of a receipt. Once the transaction is verified, the transaction or items within the transaction qualify for additional rewards that are applied to the user's account. Users who are not identified as students may qualify for a standard amount of rewards.