Machine Learning Stylist Matching Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for salon scheduling face challenges in integrating appointment booking and walk-in services, leading to complex algorithmic issues in determining optimal appointment times, waitlist management, and ensuring client preferences and stylist availability are accurately accounted for.

Innovation Solution

A unified scheduling platform that utilizes a machine-learning model to estimate wait times and optimize stylist-client matching, incorporating real-time updates and dynamic scheduling adjustments, while leveraging AI for image analysis to classify hair types and recommend suitable stylists.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a unified scheduling platform integrates appointment booking and walk-in services, then client convenience and service flexibility are improved, but algorithmic complexity and system computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice flexibilityVSAvoidalgorithmic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the scheduling problem into distinct modules: appointment booking module, walk-in module, waitlist management module, and machine learning matching module. Each module handles specific functions independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining integration benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model acts as an intermediary between client requests and stylist availability, automatically determining optimal matchings. This intermediary handles the complex algorithmic decisions, simplifying the user interface and reducing the burden on the scheduling system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time wait time updates and dynamic scheduling adjustments are implemented, then client satisfaction and service efficiency are improved, but computational load and system resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic updates of wait time estimates and scheduling adjustments rather than continuous real-time computation. The machine learning model periodically re-evaluates matchings based on current state, reducing computational load while maintaining service efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model autonomously performs dynamic scheduling adjustments based on input data from the system, without requiring manual intervention or complex external control mechanisms. This self-service capability reduces the computational overhead of system management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used for stylist-client matching, then matching accuracy and client satisfaction are improved, but model training time and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is trained in advance on historical salon data before deployment. This preliminary training action allows the model to be ready for immediate use, reducing the perceived training time during actual operation while maintaining high matching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical data copies to train the machine learning model without requiring access to live operational data during training. This allows parallel processing of model training and salon operations, minimizing the impact of training time on service delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250045657A1Machine-learning model for matching clients with stylists
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 SPORT CLIPS INC
  • US20250045657A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045657A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045657A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for matching a client with a stylist using a machine-learning model. Determining, based on the requested service, one or more candidate stylists with a minimal wait time, maximum compatibility, and maximum revenue by determining, using the machine-learning model, an estimated completion time of respective services based on historical times of completing the respective services that are calendared for respective candidate stylists. Determining an estimate completion time of the requested service based on the machine-learning model, wherein the machine-learning model uses a neural network model to make predictions about the estimate completion time based on client features and service expertise of respective candidate stylists. Recommending one or more of the set of options based on the machine-learning model, wherein the machine-learning model uses a regression model to make predictions about predicted revenue and tip for a respective service by the respective candidate stylists with a respective wait time.