Manufacturing Time-Constraint Dispatching With ML Substrate Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing systems face challenges in managing time constraints for operations, leading to substrates becoming unusable due to failure in satisfying time constraints, resulting in reduced throughput and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

A method using a machine-learning model to determine candidate substrates for processing based on current system data, applying predictive dispatching decisions to initiate operations within time constraints, and running simulations to verify the accuracy of these decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional scheduling methods are used to manage time constraints, then operators can schedule operations to run at particular times, but substrates still violate time constraints and become unusable, reducing system throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidtime constraint satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual scheduling methods with a machine learning-based automated scheduling system. The ML model analyzes current system state, historical data, and time constraints to generate optimal schedules, substituting human operator scheduling with an intelligent automated system that processes information faster and more accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the ML model receives real-time data about substrate processing status, tool capacity, and time constraint compliance. This feedback enables dynamic schedule adjustments to ensure time constraints are met while maximizing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If operators manually account for all time constraints and tool capacities, then scheduling decisions can be made, but the complexity of accounting for significant time periods makes scheduling unsuccessful

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the complex manufacturing system and the scheduling decision. The ML model absorbs the complexity of analyzing multiple time constraints, tool capacities, and interdependencies, presenting simplified scheduling recommendations to operators without exposing the underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the scheduling problem from a complex multi-constraint optimization problem into a more manageable form by using the ML model to learn patterns and relationships in the data. The model processes multiple parameters simultaneously (time constraints, tool capacities, substrate priorities) and outputs optimized schedules that satisfy all constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If computing systems attempt to solve the NP-hard scheduling problem, then complete accounting for all time constraints is attempted, but the computational difficulty makes scheduling unsuccessful

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime constraint accounting accuracyVSAvoidscheduling computation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the machine learning model to perform preliminary analysis of scheduling scenarios based on historical data and system patterns. By pre-learning optimal scheduling strategies from past data, the system can quickly generate schedules for new situations without performing exhaustive computational searches, significantly reducing computation time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of attempting to solve the complete NP-hard optimization problem exhaustively, the ML model provides sufficiently good scheduling solutions that satisfy time constraints with high accuracy. The system accepts near-optimal solutions that are computed rapidly rather than pursuing mathematically perfect solutions that would require excessive computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230107813A1Time constraint management at a manufacturing system
Publication Date: 2023.04.06 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20230107813A1 patent drawing
  • US20230107813A1 patent drawing
  • US20230107813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for time constraint management at a manufacturing system is provided. The method includes receiving a request to initiate a set of operations to be run at a manufacturing system, wherein the set of operations comprises one or more operations that each have one or more time constraints. The method further includes obtaining current data relating to a current state of the manufacturing system. The method further includes applying a machine-learning model to the current data to determine a candidate set of substrates to be processed during the set of operations. The method further includes initiating the set of operations on the candidate set of substrates based on an output of the machine-learning model.