Machine Learning Surrogate Models for Nuclear Reactor Design Optimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Designing nuclear reactor cores is a complex process that requires satisfying multiple physics disciplines, including neutronics, thermal properties, and stress analysis, which current methods often take months to complete due to inefficiencies in workflow and computational resources, even with advancements in computing power and simulation tools.
Innovation Solution
An AI suite utilizing machine learning algorithms for rapid optimization of design parameters, employing global population-based algorithms and multiphysics analysis to identify optimal design spaces within user-specified constraints, reducing the need for extensive computational resources and expert engineering time.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If traditional computational methods and supercomputers are used to simulate neutronics, thermal, and stress properties, then simulation fidelity is improved, but computation time increases to months
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by using machine learning models to pre-screen and eliminate invalid design configurations before submitting them to high-fidelity physics simulations. The system performs rapid ML-based assessments of neutronics, thermal-hydraulic, and stress properties to identify promising designs, then only those passing the ML threshold undergo expensive MCNP Monte Carlo simulations. This preliminary filtering dramatically reduces the number of full physics simulations needed, cutting computation time from months to hours while maintaining simulation fidelity for the designs that matter most.
2Productivity
If more computing power and supercomputers are added to accelerate simulations, then processing speed is improved, but computational cost and resource requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs copying by creating simplified machine learning surrogate models that replicate the behavior of complex physics simulation codes. These ML models are trained on a subset of simulation data and then used to rapidly evaluate design configurations without requiring actual physics simulations. The system copies the essential physics relationships in a computationally efficient form, enabling rapid design space exploration with minimal computational resources while maintaining accuracy for decision-making.
3Reliability
If validated physics-based simulation software is used to ensure design validity, then design reliability is improved, but workflow complexity and software integration issues increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple separate analysis workflows (neutronics, thermal-hydraulic, stress analysis) into a unified machine learning framework. Instead of running separate validated physics codes for each discipline and manually integrating results, the system combines all physics considerations into integrated ML models that simultaneously evaluate multiple design criteria. This unified approach maintains design validity by incorporating physics constraints while eliminating workflow complexity and software integration issues associated with running multiple independent simulation packages.
Data Source
AI summary
A method designs nuclear reactors using design variables and metric variables. A user specifies ranges for the design variables and threshold values for the metric variables and selects design parameter samples. For each sample, the method runs three processes, which compute metric variables for thermal-hydraulics, neutronics, and stress. The method applies a cost function to compute an aggregate residual of the metric variables compared to the threshold values. The method deploys optimization methods, either training a machine learning model using the samples and computed aggregate residuals, or using genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, or differential evolution. When using Bayesian optimization, the method shrinks the range for each design variable according to correlation between the respective design variable and estimated residuals using the machine learning model. These steps are repeated until a sample having a smallest residual is unchanged for multiple iterations. The final model assesses relative importance of each design variable.


