Machine Learning Symptom Extraction from Electronic Health Records

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for extracting symptom information from electronic health records (EHRs) are time-consuming and prone to errors due to the manual review of free-text clinical notes, which hinders clinical care and research efforts, as symptoms are often misidentified or not accurately documented.

Innovation Solution

A system and technique using computational algorithms and machine learning models to extract symptom information from free-text notes in EHRs, employing coding rules and natural language processing (NLP) to identify and categorize symptom terms, enabling faster and more accurate extraction compared to human review.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual chart review is used to extract symptom information from EHRs, then accuracy and reliability of symptom identification is maintained, but time consumption increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of symptom identificationVSAvoidspeed of data extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review of clinical notes with an automated machine learning system that uses natural language processing algorithms to extract symptom information, eliminating the need for human reviewers to manually read and code each note while maintaining extraction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model creates a computational copy of the human coding process by training on manually annotated data, allowing the system to replicate and scale the expert review process without requiring additional human resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If manual chart review is used to extract symptom information, then measurement precision of symptom data is maintained, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of symptom dataVSAvoidtime for manual review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and cleaning clinical text data before it reaches the machine learning model, and by pre-training the model on annotated datasets, so that when actual extraction is needed, the system can operate quickly without time-consuming manual review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the time-consuming manual mechanical process of reading and coding clinical notes with an automated computational system that processes text at machine speed while maintaining precision through trained algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual chart review is used, then reliability of symptom extraction is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of symptom extractionVSAvoidcomplexity of extraction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual review processes with a standardized machine learning pipeline that, while computationally intensive, provides consistent and reliable results through automated decision-making rather than variable human judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If free-text notes are reviewed manually, then accuracy of symptom identification is maintained, but quantity of data that can be processed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of symptom identificationVSAvoidvolume of processable data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes manual review with automated machine learning processing that can scale to handle large volumes of clinical notes simultaneously, processing quantities of data that would be impossible for human reviewers to examine in detail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning system is designed to handle diverse and varied free-text note formats universally, processing different styles, terminologies, and documentation approaches without requiring separate processing methods for each variant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11915828B2System and method of using machine learning for extraction of symptoms from electronic health records
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC
  • US11915828B2 patent drawing
  • US11915828B2 patent drawing
  • US11915828B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for autonomously identifying symptom terms in free running text data includes the acts of defining a plurality of symptom terms associated with a particular pathology or therapeutic substance or procedure, labeling in a text data set any defined symptom terms and associating a tag indicating any of a positive, negative, or other status with relation to the labeled symptom term, and processing with a natural language processing algorithm multiple different subsets of the text data containing labeled symptom terms to identify a frequency of occurrence of a symptom term and to improve identification accuracy.