Machine Learning Take-Over Score for Account Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network security systems face issues with insecurity and inaccuracy, leading to increased account take-over events (ATO) and system inefficiencies. These systems struggle to differentiate between legitimate user access and unauthorized access, even when two-factor authentication is circumvented.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a digital security system that utilizes a machine-learning model to generate take-over scores based on client device features. This system intelligently provides dynamic access to account features by comparing take-over scores with predefined thresholds, allowing full access or limiting access to sensitive features accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional authentication systems are used, then account access is granted based on credentials, but the system becomes vulnerable to account take-over events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount securityVSAvoidaccount take-over events
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of device features and behavioral patterns before granting full account access. By evaluating multiple device characteristics in advance and generating risk scores, the system proactively identifies potential account take-over events before they can compromise sensitive operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary authentication layer that sits between credential verification and account access. This intermediary layer analyzes device features, compares them against stored profiles, and determines access permissions based on risk assessment, rather than directly granting access upon credential validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If accurate authentication algorithms are implemented, then authorized users are correctly identified, but legitimate users are frequently mistaken for unauthorized devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice identification accuracyVSAvoidauthorized user access
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different evaluation criteria and threshold levels to different account features and operation types. Rather than using a single binary authentication decision, the system locally adjusts access permissions based on the specific operation being attempted, allowing authorized users to access low-risk features while blocking high-risk operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial access control by granting limited access to certain account features while restricting access to other features. Instead of completely blocking or fully granting access, the system applies selective restrictions based on the assessed level of risk for each specific operation or feature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If conventional systems lock accounts frequently, then security is maintained, but system operation is disrupted and computational resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccount securityVSAvoidsystem operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts access permissions based on real-time risk assessment rather than applying static account locking. Access rights are continuously evaluated and modified based on the current operation, device characteristics, and risk score, allowing the system to remain flexible and responsive to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments account access into different levels and features rather than treating account access as a single binary state. By dividing account permissions into separate controllable units, the system can selectively restrict access to specific high-risk features while maintaining access to low-risk features, avoiding complete account lockouts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250124124A1Utilizing machine-learning models to determine take-over scores and intelligently secure digital account features
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 CHIME FINANCIAL INC
  • US20250124124A1 patent drawing
  • US20250124124A1 patent drawing
  • US20250124124A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems, non-transitory computer-readable media, and methods for utilizing machine-learning models to determine take-over scores and intelligently provide or limit access to account features. In particular, in one or more embodiments, the disclosed systems can train and utilize digital security machine-learning models to generate a take-over score indicating a likelihood that the request to access the secure digital account is unauthorized activity. Based on the determining that the take-over score satisfies a take-over threshold, the disclosed systems can allow access to the secure digital account by providing secure account information but prohibit access to a subset of account features.