Machine Learning Model for Automated Test Flake Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in software testing is identifying reliable test results amidst inconsistent or non-deterministic failures, known as 'test flake,' which can be caused by factors like network latency rather than application logic issues, leading to unnecessary troubleshooting and arbitrary solutions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation employs machine learning techniques to model test runs, cluster test behaviors, and label test runs based on feedback, allowing for the reliable identification of test flake and new failure modes by simplifying test results, removing noisy information, and using unsupervised or supervised learning to categorize test run clusters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cloud-based automated testing platforms are used to enable high degree of parallelism in testing, then testing coverage and speed are improved, but test flake (inconsistent test results) increases making it difficult to determine reliable failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidtest result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by collecting multiple test run results and using machine learning models to analyze patterns. The model learns from historical test data to predict whether a failure is reliable or flaky, providing feedback that helps developers prioritize which failures to investigate. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high testing throughput while improving result reliability through intelligent analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning model that acts as a mediator between the automated testing platform and developers. This model processes raw test results and provides interpreted insights about failure reliability, eliminating the need for developers to manually analyze each failure. The intermediary resolves the contradiction by filtering noise from high-volume testing while preserving genuine failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If developers manually investigate each test failure to determine reliability, then accurate identification of real problems is possible, but troubleshooting resources are significantly expended and arbitrary solutions result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure identification accuracyVSAvoidtroubleshooting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling automated analysis of test failures through machine learning models. The model autonomously evaluates failure patterns, correlates them with test execution contexts, and determines reliability without human intervention. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high accuracy in failure identification while eliminating time-consuming manual investigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on historical test data before production use. The model learns from past failures and successes to establish baselines for reliable versus flaky behavior. This preliminary training enables rapid, accurate classification of new failures without requiring developers to manually analyze each one, resolving the time-accuracy contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If test results are simplified by removing noisy information, then test flake identification is improved, but loss of potentially important diagnostic information occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest flake identification accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing test result data into different components: essential failure information, contextual metadata, and noisy variations. The machine learning model selectively processes relevant segments for flake detection while preserving diagnostic information in structured formats. This resolves the contradiction by filtering noise for reliability assessment while retaining diagnostic value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying different processing strategies to different parts of test results. Critical failure information receives detailed analysis while peripheral noisy information is summarized or filtered. The model adapts its analysis depth based on the local importance of each data element, resolving the contradiction between noise removal and information preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11755919B2Analytics for an automated application testing platform
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 SAUCE LABS
  • US11755919B2 patent drawing
  • US11755919B2 patent drawing
  • US11755919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine learning techniques are employed to model test runs of an automated test platform in ways that allow for reliable identification of various types of test behavior such as, for example, whether certain classes of failures can be characterized as test flake.