ML Text Segmentation Using Sentence Fragments and Split Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for segmenting text into segments based on rules often result in segments that are not semantically meaningful, leading to suboptimal processing results when used with large language models, and systems that rely on document tags are limited and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a machine learning model to determine classification scores for pairs of sentence fragments, assigning split positions based on these scores to create semantically relevant and self-contained segments, which are then combined into segments that are processed by downstream systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rule-based systems are used to segment text, then the segmentation process is simple and fast, but the resulting segments are not semantically meaningful

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic meaningfulness of segmentsVSAvoidcomplexity of segmentation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical rule-based segmentation with a machine learning model that uses semantic understanding to determine segment boundaries. The model processes sentence fragments and outputs classification scores based on semantic similarity, automatically identifying optimal split positions without relying on predefined linguistic rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sentence fragments as an intermediary representation between the input text and final segments. The machine learning model processes these fragments to generate classification scores, which then guide the segmentation process. This intermediary layer enables semantic-aware segmentation while maintaining system modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If document tags are used to identify segments, then segment identification is straightforward, but the process is time-consuming and limited in applicability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of segment identificationVSAvoidtime required for segment identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the text segmentation system to automatically identify segment boundaries without requiring external document tags or manual annotation. The machine learning model self-determines optimal split positions by analyzing semantic relationships between sentence fragments, eliminating the time-consuming process of tag-based identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter for segment identification from the presence of document tags to semantic similarity scores generated by the machine learning model. This parameter change allows the system to work on untagged documents and significantly reduces processing time while improving identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If text is divided into many small sentence fragments for machine learning processing, then semantic accuracy improves, but computing time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the input text into sentence fragments as intermediate units for machine learning processing. This segmentation enables the model to analyze semantic relationships at an appropriate granularity level, improving classification accuracy while managing computational complexity through structured processing of smaller units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines adjacent sentence fragments into final segments based on classification scores. By merging fragments that have high semantic similarity, the system reduces the total number of output segments and minimizes computing resources required for downstream processing while preserving semantic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260010720A1Segmenting text using machine learning models
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 X DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US20260010720A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010720A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for determining segments from a sequence of text. One of the methods includes obtaining data representing a sequence of text; dividing the sequence of text into a plurality of sentence fragments; determining classification scores comprising determining a classification score using a machine learning model for each of a plurality of pairs of sentence fragments formed from the plurality of sentence fragments; assigning one or more split positions based on the classification scores; and combining the plurality of sentence fragments back into at least two segments, with a boundary of at least one of the at least two segments being identified by one of the one or more split positions, and wherein each segment comprises one or more sentence fragments.