Machine Learning Vehicle Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing vehicle damage are time-consuming and costly, relying on human inspectors who may provide flawed estimates, requiring multiple assessments for accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using machine learning algorithms to estimate vehicle damage by analyzing images and retrieving data from remote databases, with the ability to adjust the algorithms based on comparisons between calculated and actual damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human inspectors manually assess vehicle damage, then measurement precision can be achieved, but loss of time and productivity are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection process with an automated image processing system using computer vision and machine learning algorithms. The system automatically analyzes damage images to calculate repair estimates, eliminating the need for human inspectors to physically examine each vehicle while maintaining assessment accuracy through computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of the vehicle damage through image capture and stores them in a database. These digital representations are then processed by machine learning models to generate damage assessments, allowing rapid repeated evaluations without the time cost of physical re-inspection by human experts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple assessments are conducted to improve accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtime for multiple assessments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where actual damage assessments from inspectors are compared against machine-generated estimates. This feedback loop allows the machine learning models to learn from discrepancies and improve their accuracy over time, providing increasingly precise single assessments that eliminate the need for multiple evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary damage assessment automatically using machine learning algorithms before human inspectors conduct manual evaluations. This preliminary automated analysis provides an initial accurate estimate that reduces or eliminates the need for subsequent manual assessments, saving time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual damage assessment is performed, then reliability of evaluation is maintained, but device complexity and cost are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system performs self-improvement by automatically learning from actual damage data and adjusting its models without requiring continuous human intervention. This self-service capability maintains evaluation reliability through consistent algorithmic application while reducing operational complexity compared to coordinating multiple human inspectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240303698A1Using machine learning techniques to calculate damage of vehicles involved in an accident
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20240303698A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303698A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303698A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed systems and methods incorporate machine learning to assess damage to vehicles. An example method includes: accessing image data representing one or more digital images of damage to a vehicle; selecting, using one or more processors, an applicable machine learning algorithm from a plurality of different trained machine learning algorithms, wherein the plurality of different machine learning algorithms are trained for respective different combinations of one or more of vehicle make, vehicle model, vehicle year, or area of damage; processing the image data, with the applicable machine learning algorithm using one or more processors, to determine assessed damage for the vehicle; accessing actual damage information for the vehicle; determining, using one or more processors, differences between the actual damage and the assessed damage; and iterating, using one or more processors, the applicable machine learning algorithm based on the differences to improve its damage assessment accuracy.