ML Vehicle Defect Detection via Segmented Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for identifying vehicle defects are time-consuming and costly, making it impractical for large-scale vehicle inspections, such as those conducted by car dealers or auction marketplaces.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using trained machine learning (ML) models to assist inspectors by providing information on potential vehicle defects through a mobile device. This involves obtaining vehicle information, generating features, processing these features with trained ML models to identify defects, and notifying the inspector of potential issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods using professional mechanics are used to identify vehicle defects, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates and loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection process is segmented into multiple independent ML models, each specialized in detecting specific defect types (engine defects, transmission defects, exhaust defects, etc.). This allows parallel processing of different defect categories, improving both throughput and specialized detection accuracy without requiring a single mechanic to evaluate all aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical inspection system (professional mechanics physically examining vehicles) with an automated ML-based system that processes vehicle data, images, and sensor information. This substitution dramatically increases productivity while maintaining or improving detection precision through consistent, data-driven analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If conventional methods using professional mechanics are used to identify vehicle defects, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by processing available vehicle data, historical information, and preliminary sensor readings through ML models before the actual inspection is complete. This allows defect identification to begin in advance, reducing the overall time required while maintaining accurate detection through the precision of trained models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By replacing time-consuming manual mechanical inspection with automated ML processing that can analyze multiple data streams simultaneously, the system dramatically reduces inspection time while maintaining or improving detection precision through consistent algorithmic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated ML models are used to identify vehicle defects, then productivity is improved and loss of time is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex ML system is segmented into multiple specialized models, each handling specific defect types. This modular approach manages complexity by dividing the overall system into manageable, independent components that can be developed, trained, and maintained separately while working together to provide comprehensive inspection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If multiple trained ML models are used to detect different defect types, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidmodel system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into specialized ML models, each optimized for specific defect types (engine, transmission, exhaust, etc.). This segmentation improves measurement precision by dedicating computational resources to specific detection tasks while managing complexity through modular, independent model development and deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250027844A1Methods and systems for identifying potential vehicle defects
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 ACV AUCTIONS INC
  • US20250027844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250027844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250027844A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The inventors have developed technology to facilitate the inspection of vehicles, such as cars, for the presence of defects. The technology may be used to facilitate detection of any defects of one or more vehicle defects before, during, and/or after inspection of the vehicle. The technology includes software and trained machine learning models for performing analyses to determine likely vehicle defects prior to completion of a vehicle inspection, to determine whether any vehicle defects are present based on data acquired during the vehicle inspection, and/or to determine, after completion of the vehicle inspection, whether there are any discrepancies between any defects identified by an inspector during the vehicle inspection and defects automatically detected by analyzing data collected during the inspection of the vehicle.