Machine Learning Viral Vector Library Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for designing viral vector libraries are time-consuming and inefficient, as they often result in a high proportion of variants that fail to package properly, leading to wasted resources and prolonged development times in gene therapy applications.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based approach is employed to predict the packaging fitness of viral vector sequences, allowing for the design of libraries with enhanced packaging viability and diversity by training models to select sequences with high fitness values and optimizing trade-offs between fitness and diversity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional directed evolution methods are used to generate large numbers of randomized viral vector variants, then diversity of the library is improved, but packaging fitness deteriorates due to high proportion of variants failing to package properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelibrary diversityVSAvoidpackaging fitness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary prediction of packaging fitness for all candidate sequences before actual library construction and experimental validation. This allows filtering out low-fitness sequences in silico, preventing waste of resources on variants that would fail to package properly, while still maintaining the ability to generate diverse libraries by selectively sampling from the predicted high-fitness sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical/experimental trial-and-error approach of generating and testing viral vector variants with a computational machine learning-based prediction system. The ML model substitutes for physical packaging assays by predicting packaging fitness from sequence data alone, enabling virtual screening of library candidates before experimental validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional randomization strategies are employed to create viral vector libraries, then sequence diversity is improved, but time consumption increases due to extensive experimental testing and selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelibrary diversityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary prediction of packaging fitness for all candidate sequences before actual library construction and experimental validation. This allows filtering out low-fitness sequences in silico, preventing waste of resources on variants that would fail to package properly, while still maintaining the ability to generate diverse libraries by selectively sampling from the predicted high-fitness sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical/experimental trial-and-error approach of generating and testing viral vector variants with a computational machine learning-based prediction system. The ML model substitutes for physical packaging assays by predicting packaging fitness from sequence data alone, enabling virtual screening of library candidates before experimental validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If extensive experimental testing of viral vector variants is performed to select improved properties, then selection accuracy is improved, but resource waste increases due to high proportion of failed variants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection accuracyVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical/experimental trial-and-error approach of generating and testing viral vector variants with a computational machine learning-based prediction system. The ML model substitutes for physical packaging assays by predicting packaging fitness from sequence data alone, enabling virtual screening of library candidates before experimental validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary between sequence design and experimental validation. It translates sequence features into predicted packaging fitness values, serving as a computational mediator that filters and prioritizes candidates before they undergo resource-intensive experimental testing, thereby reducing waste while maintaining selection quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240404640A1Machine learning guided design of viral vector libraries
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 CZ BIOHUB SF LLC
  • US20240404640A1 patent drawing
  • US20240404640A1 patent drawing
  • US20240404640A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods and systems are provided for designing viral vector libraries using machine learning models. In some embodiments, by training a machine learning model to predict a packaging fitness of a viral vector sequence, a viral vector library may be designed, wherein, for a desired library diversity, an increased packaging fitness may be achieved. In one example, a machine learning model may be trained to predict packaging fitness of a viral vector sequence by encoding the viral vector sequence as a feature set, mapping the feature set to a predicted packaging fitness of the viral vector sequence using a machine learning model, determining a loss based on a difference between a ground truth packaging fitness and the predicted packaging fitness of the viral vector sequence, and updating parameters of the machine learning model based on the loss.