Machine Learning Weight Generation for Distribution Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning systems face challenges in accurately predicting outcomes due to differences between training and test data distributions, especially when the training data does not reflect the changing patterns or trends in the test data over time.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where a processor identifies and compares the distributions of training and test data, determining weights to adapt the training data to conform to the test data distribution by dividing coordinate ranges into bins and calculating frequencies within these bins, allowing the machine learning system to generate weighted functions that better match the test data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional machine learning training is used with static training data, then the training process is simple and fast, but the predictive accuracy deteriorates when test data distribution changes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidtraining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of test data distribution before training, generating reweighting factors in advance that adjust training data weights based on predicted test distribution characteristics. This preliminary action allows the model to adapt to distribution shifts without complex runtime adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A distribution analyzer acts as an intermediary component between the training data and the machine learning model. This intermediary analyzes test data distribution characteristics and generates reweighting factors that mediate the training process, enabling the model to adapt to distribution changes without direct complex interactions between training and test distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If training data distribution is adjusted to match test data distribution, then predictive accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of globally reweighting all training data points uniformly, the system applies local quality adjustments by computing reweighting factors specific to different regions of the feature space based on distribution analysis. This allows selective emphasis on important data regions while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the weight parameter of training data points dynamically based on distribution analysis results. By adjusting this single parameter according to test data distribution characteristics, the model adapts to distribution shifts without requiring fundamental changes to the training architecture or extensive computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If distribution analysis and reweighting is performed, then the model adapts better to test data, but the training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution adaptabilityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into distinct phases: distribution analysis phase, reweighting factor generation phase, and model training phase. This segmentation allows for efficient processing by focusing computational efforts in each phase on specific tasks, reducing overall training time while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial distribution analysis by focusing on key features or critical regions of the data distribution rather than analyzing the entire feature space in detail. This partial action provides sufficient adaptability information to improve model performance while significantly reducing the computational time required for full distribution analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9858534B2Weight generation in machine learning
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US9858534B2 patent drawing
  • US9858534B2 patent drawing
  • US9858534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are generally described for systems, devices and methods relating to a machine learning environment. In some examples, a processor may identify a training distribution of a training data. The processor may identify information about a test distribution of a test data. The processor may identify a coordinate of the training data and the test data. The processor may determine, for the coordinate, differences between the test distribution and the training distribution. The processor may determine weights based on the differences. The weights may be adapted to cause the training distribution to conform to the test distribution when the weights are applied to the training distribution.