ML Work Order Scheduling with Dynamic Route Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional work order scheduling systems fail to accurately predict the duration of tasks for service providers, leading to delays and extra costs due to inefficient route planning and lack of consideration for technician expertise, workload, and schedule, resulting in suboptimal work order assignment and increased travel times.

Innovation Solution

A system employing machine learning algorithms to dynamically schedule work orders and plan routes in real-time, taking into account historical data, technician performance, and weighted factors such as priority, value, and travel time, to optimize work order distribution and route efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pre-determined automated rules are used to assign work orders, then work order assignment is simple and fast, but the accuracy of predicting task duration deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework order assignment speedVSAvoidtask duration prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously learning from historical work order data and actual task completion times. The machine learning model is trained on past performance data, creating a feedback loop that improves prediction accuracy over time while maintaining automated assignment speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from static pre-determined rules to dynamic machine learning-based predictions. By transforming the assignment mechanism from rule-based to data-driven, the system achieves both automated speed and improved prediction accuracy through continuous parameter optimization based on historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional scheduling systems assign work orders without considering technician expertise and workload, then assignment process is simple, but work order completion timeliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling system complexityVSAvoidwork order completion timeliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-evaluating technician expertise, current workload, and skill matching before work order assignment. This advance preparation ensures that work orders are assigned to the most suitable technicians, improving completion timeliness while the system handles the complexity automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system serves itself by automatically considering technician expertise and workload without manual intervention. The machine learning model autonomously evaluates multiple technician parameters and makes optimal assignments, maintaining simplicity in operation while improving reliability through intelligent decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If work orders are assigned without dynamic route planning, then assignment process is straightforward, but travel time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment process simplicityVSAvoidtravel time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by implementing real-time route optimization that adapts to changing conditions. The machine learning model dynamically calculates optimal routes based on current traffic, location, and work order priorities, reducing travel time while the system automatically manages the complexity of route planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240338619A1Automatically scheduling and route planning for service providers
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US20240338619A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338619A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338619A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method can include training a machine learning algorithm to determine a duration of a new work order, based on (a) historical input data for the machine learning algorithm and (b) historical output data for the machine learning algorithm. The method can also include determining one or more work orders for a service provider comprising: determining, by the machine learning algorithm, as trained, one or more durations of the one or more work orders; and determining an optimized service route for the one or more work orders. The method can further include updating a work schedule for the service provider based on the optimized service route. Other embodiments are also provided.