Work Management Platform Using ML for Worker-Order Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current work management techniques, especially in the gig economy and shipping industries, face challenges in efficiently matching workers with orders due to scheduling conflicts, communication issues, and the need to minimize costs while maximizing quality, often leading to suboptimal outcomes and inefficient workflows.

Innovation Solution

A work management platform that uses machine learning models to calculate order-worker scores based on order characteristics and past worker behavior, optimizing the matching process to predict selection and completion likelihoods, and dynamically updating assignments to improve workflow efficiency and worker satisfaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional heuristics are used to match workers and work, then the matching process is simple, but the matching quality is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/heuristic matching systems with machine learning models that automatically learn from historical data to predict worker-order match quality. The system uses trained models to calculate match scores and make assignments, eliminating the need for manual or rule-based heuristic matching while achieving superior matching quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by continuously learning from historical worker behavior data and order outcomes. The machine learning models automatically update their parameters based on observed performance, enabling the system to improve matching quality over time without external intervention or complex manual tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If work management techniques do not adequately consider relevant information, then the workflow management is simple, but the outcomes are inefficient and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow efficiencyVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of historical data and worker behavior patterns before making current matching decisions. By pre-training machine learning models on past performance data, the system prepares predictive frameworks that can quickly assess new worker-order combinations without requiring complex real-time analysis, thus improving productivity while managing computational resources efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where actual worker performance on orders is fed back into the machine learning models. This continuous feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from real outcomes and refine its matching algorithms, improving future matching accuracy and workflow efficiency while the automated feedback processing manages information processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the organization seeks to minimize costs while maximizing quality, then the optimization goal is clear, but achieving both simultaneously is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder completion qualityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts matching parameters and prioritization criteria based on real-time conditions and historical performance data. The machine learning models optimize the balance between quality and cost by learning which parameter combinations yield the best outcomes, allowing the system to adapt to changing operational conditions and achieve both high reliability and cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual cost-quality optimization processes with automated machine learning systems that continuously evaluate trade-offs. The trained models automatically determine optimal matching decisions that balance quality metrics and cost parameters, eliminating the need for manual intervention in optimization while achieving superior cost-quality balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240220893A1Work management platform
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 SHIPT INC
  • US20240220893A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220893A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform for managing work is disclosed. In example embodiments, the platform may match orders and workers. In some embodiments, the platform may use one or more models that have inputs related to order characteristics or past worker behavior. In some embodiments, the platform may receive future orders and actualize future orders. To actualize future orders, the platform may use one or more models that have inputs related to order characteristics or past worker behavior. In some examples, orders may be shopping orders or deliveries. In some examples, workers may be shoppers or drivers.