ML Workload Resource Allocation for Proactive Cloud Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing virtual computing environments face inefficiencies in workload management due to reactive resource allocation methods, leading to suboptimal resource usage, increased costs, and performance issues such as long completion times and unexpected workload restarts, with a lack of timely visibility into resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a proactive workload management system that uses machine learning models to predict and adjust resource allocations based on monitored metrics, requester types, and behaviors, dynamically adjusting the number of virtual compute entities, physical computing nodes, and resource types to optimize resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If reactive resource allocation methods are used, then resource allocation can be adjusted based on current workload, but resource usage becomes suboptimal leading to over-provisioning or under-provisioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload performanceVSAvoidresource usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future resource requirements using machine learning models before the workload actually needs the resources. The workload management system continuously monitors metrics and uses ML predictions to proactively allocate resources in advance, preventing both over-provisioning and under-provisioning by having the right resources ready when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where workload metrics are monitored, ML models predict future resource needs based on this feedback, and resource allocations are adjusted accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past performance and continuously optimize resource allocation to improve productivity while reducing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of resource allocations is performed, then resource allocation can be customized, but the process becomes labor intensive and slow reducing agility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation flexibilityVSAvoidworkload management automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The workload management system performs self-service by automatically monitoring workload metrics, predicting resource requirements using machine learning models, and adjusting resource allocations without manual intervention. The system serves itself by making intelligent decisions based on observed patterns and predictions, maintaining high adaptability while eliminating the labor-intensive nature of manual resource management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated intelligent system. Instead of human operators manually analyzing metrics and adjusting resources, machine learning models automatically perform the analysis and trigger resource allocation adjustments, substituting human mechanical actions with automated computational processes that are faster and more scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of energy

If insufficient resources are allocated to a workload, then resource costs are reduced, but workload performance suffers with long completion times or unexpected restarts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource costVSAvoidworkload completion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system takes preliminary action by predicting resource requirements before workloads execute. Machine learning models analyze historical data and current metrics to forecast the exact resources needed, allowing the system to allocate sufficient resources in advance to ensure reliable workload completion while avoiding allocation of excess resources that would increase costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes resource allocation parameters based on ML predictions and monitored workload characteristics. By adjusting resource allocation parameters in real-time based on actual workload behavior and predictions, the system optimizes the balance between resource cost and workload reliability, allocating exactly the right amount of resources needed for each workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If there is lack of timely visibility into resource consumption, then system complexity is reduced, but the ability to understand and improve workload performance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidresource consumption visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs multiple functions: it monitors workload metrics, predicts resource requirements, guides resource allocation decisions, and provides visibility into resource consumption patterns. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate monitoring, prediction, and analysis systems into a single unified workload management system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260064482A1Workload resource allocation using a machine learning model
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US20260064482A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064482A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064482A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a system receives, from a requester, a request to perform a first workload in a virtual computing environment, and determines a type of the requester, the determined type being one of a plurality of different requester types. The system receives metrics relating to resource usage in the virtual computing environment, and determines, using a machine learning model, an allocation of resources to the first workload based on the determined type of the requester and the metrics. The machine learning model adjusts the allocation of resources to the first workload based on further collected metrics relating to resource usage by the workload and based on a detected behavior of the requester while the first workload is performed in the virtual computing environment.