Multi-link Device Mode Selection for WLAN Power and Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IEEE 802.11be specifications lack clear guidance on how to balance power consumption with throughput and latency performance in multi-link operation, particularly in environments with competing design objectives such as high throughput/low latency versus power saving requirements.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves a method and apparatus for a non-AP multi-link device (MLD) to dynamically select between different operating modes based on performance and power saving requirements, using a processor to determine the optimal mode of operation between simultaneous transmit and receive (STR), Enhanced Multi-Link Single Radio (EMLSR), and single link modes, depending on latency, throughput, and contention environment conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multi-link operation is used to achieve high throughput and low latency, then performance is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode selection that allows the non-AP MLD to switch between different operating modes (STR, EMLSR, single-link) based on real-time network conditions and traffic requirements. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize power consumption while maintaining high throughput when needed by selecting appropriate links and modes, rather than operating in a fixed high-performance state continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different frequency bands (2.4 GHz vs 5 GHz) and different operating modes (STR vs EMLSR vs single-link) based on traffic characteristics. This parameter adjustment allows the system to achieve high throughput when performance is critical while consuming less power during normal operations or when traffic requirements are less demanding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If simultaneous transmit and receive mode is used for low latency, then latency is reduced, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode selection that allows the non-AP MLD to switch between different operating modes (STR, EMLSR, single-link) based on real-time network conditions and traffic requirements. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize power consumption while maintaining low latency when needed by selecting appropriate links and modes, rather than operating in a fixed low-latency state continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different frequency bands (2.4 GHz vs 5 GHz) and different operating modes (STR vs EMLSR vs single-link) based on traffic characteristics. This parameter adjustment allows the system to achieve low latency when performance is critical while consuming less power during normal operations or when traffic requirements are less demanding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If single link mode is used for power saving, then power consumption is reduced, but throughput and latency performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode selection that allows the non-AP MLD to switch between different operating modes (STR, EMLSR, single-link) based on real-time network conditions and traffic requirements. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize power consumption while maintaining high throughput when needed by selecting appropriate links and modes, rather than operating in a fixed low-power state continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different frequency bands (2.4 GHz vs 5 GHz) and different operating modes (STR vs EMLSR vs single-link) based on traffic characteristics. This parameter adjustment allows the system to achieve low latency when performance is critical while consuming less power during normal operations or when traffic requirements are less demanding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240357504A1Multi-link operation for next generation WLAN
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240357504A1 patent drawing
  • US20240357504A1 patent drawing
  • US20240357504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses for facilitating selection between operating modes of MLDs. A non-AP MLD comprises a processor and STAs having first and second links operating in the 5 and 2.4 GHz bands, respectively, with APs of an AP MLD. The processor determines: based on traffic latency/throughput requirements, to operate in STR mode using both links, or, based on power saving requirements, to operate in a single link mode using the second link, or, based on the power savings requirements having a higher priority than the latency/throughput requirements, to operate in EMLSR mode using both links or in the single link mode using the first link. If the power savings and latency/throughput requirements are balanced, the processor determines: in a high contention environment, to operate in EMLSR mode using both links or, in a low contention environment, to operate in STR mode using both links.