MLM Merger System Unifying Commission Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Merging Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) companies with different commission structures poses challenges, including member disorientation, income impact, logistical issues, and infringement risks, as existing methods fail to seamlessly integrate varying structures without third-party assistance.

Innovation Solution

A Multi-Level Marketing Merger System that reorganizes user connections and positions from Unilevel, Binary, or Matrix MLMs into a Multiline MLM, creating crossline connections to reconcile commission structures and maximize earnings, utilizing a system comprising a Multiline MLM User Database, Sales Database, Commission Module, and Merger Module to update and store user data and commission rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If MLM companies with different commission structures merge while keeping structures separate, then company integration is achieved, but members experience disorientation and income changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommission structure integrationVSAvoidmember orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple MLM companies with different commission structures (unilevel, binary, matrix) into a single unified multiline commission structure. The system automatically reorganizes user connections and positions across the merged entities, converting various commission types into a standardized multiline format that maintains continuity of earnings while eliminating structural fragmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms different commission structure parameters (unilevel, binary, matrix configurations) into a standardized multiline parameter set. By changing the structural parameters of individual commission systems and reconfiguring them under a unified multiline framework, the system maintains earnings equivalence while achieving structural integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If MLM companies merge and reorganize commission structures, then structural integration is achieved, but members feel upset by changes impacting commission income

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommission structure unificationVSAvoidcommission income stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and simulations before executing the merger to ensure that member commission earnings remain comparable. By pre-calculating the impact of structure changes and adjusting the multiline configuration in advance, the system guarantees income stability while achieving structural unification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors and compares commission earnings before and after the merger transformation. By implementing feedback mechanisms that track income changes, the system can adjust the reorganization process to maintain earnings equivalence, ensuring members do not experience income disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If non-licensed MLMs merge without third-party assistance, then cost reduction is achieved, but IP infringement risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerger process costVSAvoidIP infringement risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a licensed third-party software service provider as an intermediary to facilitate the merger process. This intermediary system performs the complex task of merging and reorganizing MLM structures, thereby reducing direct IP infringement risks for non-licensed companies while maintaining cost-effectiveness through automated software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If large MLMs merge, then business growth is achieved, but logistical and data storage issues arise that the merged MLM cannot handle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebusiness scaleVSAvoiddata storage and logistics
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a licensed third-party software service provider as an intermediary to handle the complex logistical and data storage requirements of merging large MLMs. This external infrastructure absorbs the computational and storage burdens, allowing the merged MLM to achieve business growth without being constrained by its own limited technical capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions the data storage and processing burden from the internal systems of the MLM to an external cloud-based third-party infrastructure. By moving operations to another dimension (external service layer), the system enables large-scale mergers without overloading the merged entity's internal technical resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20230237514A1Software as a service for merging and managing user structures
Publication Date: 2023.07.27 KWIKCLICK LLC
  • US20230237514A1 patent drawing
  • US20230237514A1 patent drawing
  • US20230237514A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system and method to any two or more MLMs to be merged into a multiline MLM system despite having different commission structures. Each member of the original MLMs is able to maintain their existing downlines without any changes. Further the existing MLM members have full access to the multi-line MLM commission structure, for example, a member of a binary MLM may now add a 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. line if they choose. The multiline commission plan will be different than the commission plans from any of the original MLMs but this change should not affect the income of a large portion of users, and users that are affected by the changeover can be compensated or made whole on an individual level. In addition to this multiline commission plan, the commission structure of the original MLMs has been broken into several separate ‘types’ which together form an MLM system. These ‘types’ include the income received from downline commission based on position and the income received based on enrolling a member in the MLM, also known as sponsorship. This system is one that may be hosted on the internet or cloud computing services and may provide remote access to the newly formed MLMs. The system will provide essential services to the MLMs such as databasing, commission calculation, and commission structure modification, for free or for a fee. MLMs, their agents, executives, employees, members, and other entities selected by the MLM will be able to access the system using secure credentials.