MLPE-Based PV Module Parameter Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for evaluating distributed energy resource (DER) performance are often biased due to differences between the as-designed and as-built configurations, leading to inaccuracies in computing system parameters such as expected energy production.

Innovation Solution

The use of module-level power electronics (MLPE) to measure and validate parameters like temperature, DC current, and DC voltage, allowing for the inference of latitude, longitude, azimuth, and tilt of PV modules, thereby confirming whether the 'as built' configuration matches the 'as designed' metadata and ensuring accurate performance expectations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional DER performance evaluation methods are used, then the evaluation process is simple, but the accuracy of system parameters is biased due to configuration differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of system parametersVSAvoidcomplexity of validation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The MLPE devices perform self-validation by automatically comparing their operational parameters (temperature, current, voltage) against expected values derived from design specifications. This self-service approach enables the system to detect configuration deviations without requiring external validation equipment, thereby improving measurement precision while minimizing additional system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where MLPE data is continuously monitored and compared against expected performance parameters. When deviations are detected, the system generates alerts and facilitates corrective actions. This closed-loop feedback approach ensures accurate parameter validation while maintaining operational simplicity through automated comparison and notification processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If MLPE data collection is implemented, then parameter validation accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical parameters (temperature, current, voltage) from the comprehensive MLPE data stream that are necessary for validation purposes. By filtering and extracting only the essential data elements needed for configuration validation, the system achieves high validation accuracy while minimizing the complexity of data processing and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process is segmented into distinct analytical steps: data collection from MLPE devices, parameter extraction, comparison against expected values, and deviation detection. This segmentation of the validation process into modular, manageable stages reduces overall data processing complexity while maintaining comprehensive validation accuracy through systematic analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10365309B2Method and apparatus for using module-level power electronics data for validating distributed energy resource system parameters
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 ENPHASE ENERGY INC
  • US10365309B2 patent drawing
  • US10365309B2 patent drawing
  • US10365309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for validating distributed energy resource as-designed parameters. In one embodiment the method comprises obtaining, from MLPE coupled to a PV module of the DER, data corresponding to sunrise on a particular day; obtaining, from MLPE, data corresponding to sunset on the particular day; determining, by the computer system and using the data corresponding to the sunrise and the data corresponding to the sunset, (i) the length of the particular day and (ii) the solar noon for the particular day; computing, by the computer system and using the length of the particular day and the solar noon for the particular day, an as-built latitude for the PV module and an as-built longitude for the PV module; and comparing, by the computer system, (a) the as-built latitude to an as-designed latitude for the PV module, and (b) the as-built longitude to an as-designed longitude for the PV module.