MMC Converter Cell Fault Classification Using Current Derivative

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protection systems for modular multi-level converter (MMC) cells provide insufficient uptime and reliability, necessitating an improved method for controlling converter cells that offers higher availability and better fault handling.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling MMC converter cells that involves monitoring current derivatives, detecting faults, operating fault response circuitry, and classifying faults based on current derivative thresholds to tailor responses for different fault severities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a protection system using crowbar circuits and bypass switches is implemented, then equipment safety and system reliability are improved, but converter cell uptime and availability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidconverter cell uptime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of fault detection from binary (fault present/absent) to continuous (current derivative magnitude), enabling differentiation between fault severities. This allows the system to adjust protection responses dynamically, avoiding unnecessary bypass activations for minor faults and thus improving converter cell uptime while maintaining reliability for severe faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different protection responses to different fault locations and severities. By monitoring current derivatives at switching elements and classifying faults locally, the system can target protection actions only where necessary, avoiding system-wide bypass activation and improving overall availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If fault protection is implemented with bypass switches, then critical components are protected, but system availability and operational time are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidsystem availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial protection action by activating bypass switches only for severe faults that truly require isolation. For minor faults, the system applies no bypass action, allowing continued operation. This partial action approach maintains component protection where needed while maximizing system availability by avoiding unnecessary shutdowns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If conventional protection systems bypass faulty converter cells, then fault propagation is prevented, but maintenance frequency increases and uptime decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault propagation preventionVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments faults into different severity levels (minor, moderate, severe) based on current derivative magnitudes. This segmentation allows differentiated responses: minor faults require no bypass or maintenance, moderate faults may require monitoring or scheduled maintenance, and severe faults trigger immediate bypass and maintenance. This resolves the contradiction by preventing unnecessary maintenance for non-critical faults while maintaining propagation prevention for severe faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4518122A1Method for controlling a converter cell and a control system
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • EP4518122A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4518122A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4518122A1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

There is disclosed herein a method for controlling a converter cell (10) of a modular multi-level converter, MMC (1), said converter cell comprising a fault response circuitry. The method comprises monitoring (S1) at least one current derivative, di/dt, in the converter cell, detecting (S2) a fault in the converter cell, operating the fault response circuitry in response to the fault, and classifying (S3) the fault based on the current derivative. There is also disclosed a control system (2) performing said method.