Modular Multi-Level Converter DC Fault Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional modular multilevel converters (MMC) face challenges in effectively blocking DC failures, leading to increased switching losses and potential damage from fault currents, particularly when using full-bridge circuits, which are more costly and inefficient compared to half-bridge circuits.

Innovation Solution

The MMC incorporates a combination of full-bridge and half-bridge submodules within each converter arm, utilizing a circuit opening unit to manage and block DC fault currents by turning off power semiconductors and using a disconnector to isolate the circuit when the fault current reaches zero, thereby reducing switching losses and protecting internal components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full-bridge circuits are used to block DC fault current, then DC failure blocking capability is improved, but switching loss increases by 30% or more

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC failure blocking capabilityVSAvoidswitching loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The converter arms are segmented into two types: first converter arms with full-bridge submodules for DC fault blocking and second converter arms with half-bridge submodules for normal operation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve DC failure blocking capability only where necessary while maintaining efficiency in other parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different circuit configurations are applied to different converter arms based on their functional requirements. The first converter arms use full-bridge circuits with bidirectional switches for DC fault blocking capability, while the second converter arms use simpler half-bridge circuits for efficient normal operation, optimizing local characteristics for specific functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If full-bridge submodules are used for all converter arms, then DC fault current blocking is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDC fault current blockingVSAvoidnumber of IGBTs and diodes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into first converter arms requiring DC fault blocking (using full-bridge submodules) and second converter arms for normal operation (using half-bridge submodules). This segmentation reduces the total number of full-bridge submodules needed, thereby reducing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Half-bridge submodules are used in second converter arms as a simpler, more economical alternative to full-bridge submodules. These half-bridge submodules perform adequately for normal operation without providing DC fault blocking, reducing the overall component count and system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Device complexity

If half-bridge circuits are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but DC fault current cannot be blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit structure simplicityVSAvoidDC failure protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The converter system is segmented into first converter arms with full-bridge submodules for DC fault protection and second converter arms with half-bridge submodules for simple normal operation. This segmentation ensures that DC failure protection is provided only where required while maintaining simplicity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The full-bridge submodules in the first converter arms serve dual functions: normal power conversion and DC fault current blocking. This multi-functionality allows a single component type to address both operational requirements, eliminating the need for separate protection devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3399615B1Modular multi-level converter and DC failure blocking method therefor
Publication Date: 2021.05.19 HYOSUNG HEAVY IND CORP
  • EP3399615B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3399615B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3399615B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides an MMC and a DC failure blocking method therefor, the MMC and the method being capable of DC failure blocking and reducing loss using a combination of half-bridge submodules and full-bridge submodules for converter arms of the MMC. According to the present invention, there is provided a modular multilevel converter (MMC) including multiple converter arms, each converter arm having: N (N ≥ 2, an integer) submodules connected to each other in series; and a circuit opening unit connected to the N submodules in series to open a circuit of the converter arm, wherein the N submodules are n (n < N) submodules including full-bridge circuits and N-n submodules including half-bridge circuits.