MMU Page Table Checksums for Multi-Bit Flip Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing memory protection techniques, such as SECDED ECC, are inadequate in detecting and correcting multiple bit-flips in computer memory, leading to potential program crashes and disruptions due to bit-flips caused by cosmic rays, electromagnetic radiation, or malicious attacks.

Innovation Solution

A compiler-based technique that modifies executable software to require a higher number of bit-flips to transform legitimate values and inserts code to check for illegitimate values, combined with a collaborative hardware-software approach where the operating system and hardware components detect and respond to bit-flips in critical data structures like page tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If SECDED ECC is used for memory protection, then single bit-flip correction and double bit-flip detection are achieved, but multi-bit bit-flip detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit-flip detection capabilityVSAvoidmemory protection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the memory protection function into multiple independent components: SECDED ECC for basic error correction, parity bits for additional error detection, and checksum fields for multi-bit error detection. Each component operates independently but complements the others, allowing the system to detect various types of bit-flips without requiring a completely new complex protection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple error detection and correction techniques (SECDED ECC, parity checking, checksum validation) into a unified memory protection system. By merging these different approaches, the system achieves comprehensive protection against single-bit, double-bit, and multi-bit bit-flips while maintaining compatibility with existing memory architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If more robust error detection mechanisms are implemented, then detection precision improves, but system performance and processing speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial error checking by using different detection strategies for different types of data. Critical data structures (such as page tables) receive comprehensive multi-layered error detection, while less critical data uses standard ECC protection. This selective approach ensures high detection accuracy for important data without unnecessarily slowing down processing of all memory operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary structures such as checksum fields and parity bits that are computed and stored alongside the main data. These intermediaries enable rapid error detection during memory operations without requiring complex real-time calculations, thus maintaining system processing speed while improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If compiler-based techniques with higher Hamming distance are used, then resilience to bit-flips improves, but code complexity and execution overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram resilience to bit-flipsVSAvoidcode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary error prevention by having the compiler automatically assign enum values with sufficient Hamming distance during the compilation phase. This preliminary action ensures that legitimate enum values are sufficiently differentiated before the program runs, preventing bit-flip-induced transformations without requiring complex runtime checks or additional code structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the compiler to automatically handle the complexity of error-resistant encoding by implementing algorithms that compute and assign optimal enum values with appropriate Hamming distances. This self-service approach eliminates the need for programmers to manually design complex error-resistant data structures, reducing code complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If runtime checks for enum values are added, then bit-flip detection capability improves, but execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit-flip detection capabilityVSAvoidprogram execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective runtime checking where enum value validation is performed only at critical program locations and for critical data structures. By applying partial checking rather than universal validation, the system maintains high bit-flip detection capability for important operations while minimizing execution time overhead in non-critical paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12554843B1Collaborative hardware-software technique for increasing resilience to bit-flips
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12554843B1 patent drawing
  • US12554843B1 patent drawing
  • US12554843B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory management unit (MMU) of a computing device obtains an indication that an algorithm is being used by a program to generate, for storage within a first subset of bits of an entry of an address translation data structure, a value generated from a second subset of bits of the entry. During a traversal of the data structure entry to perform a virtual-to-physical address translation, the MMU applies the algorithm to the second subset of bits. In response to determining that the result obtained from the algorithm by the MMU does not match the value stored in the first subset of bits, the MMU initiates a remedial action associated with bit-flips.