Millimeter Wave Repeater Timing Configuration via Capability-Based Mode Selection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current wireless communication systems, particularly in millimeter wave repeaters, face challenges in determining optimal operation modes for synchronization and timing configurations, leading to inefficiencies in communication and resource management due to varying capabilities among repeaters.
Innovation Solution
A method where base stations receive information about the capabilities of millimeter wave repeaters through different interfaces, determining whether to operate in asynchronous or synchronous modes based on this information, and communicating accordingly to optimize timing configurations and resource utilization.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If synchronous operation mode is used for millimeter wave repeaters, then timing precision and synchronization are improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to requiring precise timing capability and internal clock
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically selects between synchronous and asynchronous operation modes based on repeater capabilities. The base station receives capability information from the repeater and determines the appropriate operation mode, allowing the system to adapt timing configurations rather than requiring all repeaters to support synchronous mode with its complex timing requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the operational parameter (synchronization mode) based on repeater capabilities. By receiving capability information and determining operation modes, the system adjusts timing parameters dynamically - using synchronous mode with precise timing when capabilities allow, and asynchronous mode when they don't, thus resolving the contradiction between timing precision and device complexity
2Device complexity
If asynchronous operation mode is used for millimeter wave repeaters, then device complexity and cost are reduced, but timing synchronization and communication efficiency deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically selects between synchronous and asynchronous operation modes based on repeater capabilities. The base station receives capability information from the repeater and determines the appropriate operation mode, allowing the system to adapt timing configurations rather than requiring all repeaters to support synchronous mode with its complex timing requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the operational parameter (synchronization mode) based on repeater capabilities. By receiving capability information and determining operation modes, the system adjusts timing parameters dynamically - using synchronous mode with precise timing when capabilities allow, and asynchronous mode when they don't, thus resolving the contradiction between timing precision and device complexity
3Device complexity
If a single operation mode is used for all repeaters, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to varying repeater capabilities deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically selects between synchronous and asynchronous operation modes based on repeater capabilities. The base station receives capability information from the repeater and determines the appropriate operation mode, allowing the system to adapt timing configurations rather than requiring all repeaters to support synchronous mode with its complex timing requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the operational parameter (synchronization mode) based on repeater capabilities. By receiving capability information and determining operation modes, the system adjusts timing parameters dynamically - using synchronous mode with precise timing when capabilities allow, and asynchronous mode when they don't, thus resolving the contradiction between timing precision and device complexity
Data Source
AI summary
Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a base station may receive, from a repeater having a first interface and a second interface, information associated with one or more capabilities of the repeater, the second interface being different from the first interface. The base station may determine an operation mode for the repeater based at least in part on the information associated with the one or more capabilities of the repeater, and may communicate with the repeater via the first interface or the second interface. In some aspects, a repeater may transmit to a base station via a first interface, information associated with one or more capabilities of the repeater, and may communicate via the first interface or via a second interface in accordance with an indicated operation mode, the second interface being different from the first interface. Numerous other aspects are provided.


