11-Methylene-18-Methyl-Estr-4-en-3,17-dione Synthesis via MnO2 Oxidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing 11-methylene-18-methyl-estr-4-en-3,17-dione are hindered by the use of chromium(VI)-based reagents, complex chromatographic purifications, and excessive reaction steps, making them unsuitable for industrial-scale production due to safety concerns and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the oxidation of 11α-hydroxy-18-methyl-estra-4-en-3,17-dione, followed by selective reduction, Wittig reaction, and subsequent hydrolysis, which reduces the number of steps and avoids chromium(VI)-based reagents and chromatographic purifications, using commonly available reagents and solvents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If chromium(VI)-based reagents are used for oxidation, then oxidation efficiency is improved, but safety and carcinogenicity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation efficiencyVSAvoidcarcinogenicity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the oxidizing agent from chromium(VI)-based reagents to manganese dioxide (MnO2). This parameter change maintains the oxidation capability while eliminating the carcinogenicity issue, as MnO2 is a safer alternative that does not pose the same health risks as chromium(VI) compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If complex chromatographic purifications are used, then product purity is improved, but process complexity and time worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidpurification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for complex chromatographic purifications by optimizing the reaction conditions and workup procedures. The modified synthesis protocol allows for simpler purification methods, removing the requirement for sophisticated chromatography equipment and reducing both process complexity and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If excessive reaction steps are used, then synthesis completeness is improved, but productivity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis completenessVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple reaction steps into more efficient sequences. By combining certain transformations and optimizing the order of operations, the protocol reduces the total number of steps while maintaining synthesis completeness. This merging of operations directly improves productivity by reducing time and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If long and complex laboratory procedures are used for separation, then product purity is improved, but industrial applicability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidindustrial applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts simpler, more economical purification methods that are suitable for industrial scale-up. By replacing complex chromatographic techniques with more straightforward separation methods, the process becomes more economically viable and easier to manufacture at industrial levels, while still achieving the required product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process efficiently synthesizes 11-methylene-18-methyl-estr-4-en-3,17-dione with fewer steps and safer reagents, making it more industrially viable by eliminating chromium(VI) and chromatographic requirements, while maintaining high yield and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

oxidation of 11α-hydroxy-18-methyl-estra-4-en-3,17-dione (II) to 18-methyl-estra-4-en-3,11,17-trione (III)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

Wittig reaction on intermediate compound (V) to form the corresponding methylene derivative (VI)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWittig reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

hydrolysis of intermediate compound (VII) to form 11-methylene-18-methyl-estr-4-en-3,17-dione (I)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP2892909B1Process for the preparation of 11-methylene-18-methylestr-4-en-3,17-dione, useful as an intermediate in the synthesis of compounds with pharmacological activity.
Publication Date: 2016.08.24 IND CHEM SRL
  • EP2892909B1 patent drawing
  • EP2892909B1 patent drawing
  • EP2892909B1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is described a process for the industrial synthesis of 11-methylene-18- methyl-estr-4-en-3, 17-dione, a compound having the structure formula (I) depicted below: (Formula I) (I) useful as intermediate compound in the synthesis of the progestin compounds Desogestrel and Etonogestrel.