Moab Assemblies for Build Project Data Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current modeling software for build projects, such as CAD and BIM, lack efficient systems for streamlining component fabrication, leading to knowledge loss when employees leave and inconsistencies in fabrication methods.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Moab assemblies, which are data files that logically link materials and tasks for components in a build project, allowing for the creation of project tasks and material procurement based on a logical progression of tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If employees manually manage component fabrication knowledge, then flexibility in handling different components is maintained, but knowledge is lost when employees leave and fabrication methods become inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of fabrication methodsVSAvoidfabrication knowledge loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of fabrication knowledge in the form of Moab assemblies and work phase data. These digital representations capture all necessary information about component fabrication processes, materials, and procedures, preserving knowledge permanently without relying on employee memory or experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated task generation and material procurement. The Moab assembly automatically generates project tasks and procurement requests based on the build project model, eliminating the need for employees to manually manage fabrication knowledge while ensuring consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple employees use different fabrication methods, then individual expertise can be applied, but confusion and inconsistencies arise that make problem identification difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee expertise applicationVSAvoidfabrication consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The Moab assembly serves as a universal template that can be applied to any component of a specific type. It contains all necessary fabrication instructions, materials, and procedures in a standardized format, ensuring that every component of the same type is fabricated identically regardless of which employee works on it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of fabrication from employee-dependent variables to system-controlled constants. The Moab assembly defines fixed parameters for materials, processes, and procedures that must be followed, transforming fabrication from an artisanal process to a standardized manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If employees manually track materials and tasks for each component, then detailed control is possible, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial and task trackingVSAvoidmanual tracking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The Moab assembly is prepared in advance with all necessary information about materials, tasks, and procedures. This preliminary action allows the system to automatically generate project tasks and procurement requests without requiring employees to manually track each component during execution, significantly reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual tracking with an automated information system. The application service automatically generates project tasks, tracks materials, and manages procurement based on the Moab assembly data, eliminating the need for employees to manually track each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If the system automates task generation and material procurement, then efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fabrication process into distinct components: the Moab assembly (containing component-specific data), the build project model (containing project-level information), and the application service (containing automation logic). This segmentation allows each component to remain relatively simple while the integrated system provides advanced automation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250053904A1Materials and process integration for build projects with moab assemblies
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 EVOLVE MEP LLC
  • US20250053904A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053904A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053904A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for creating moab assemblies and applying moab assemblies to build project data. Moab assemblies can logically link materials and tasks for components used in a build project. When a model of a build project is created, an application service can retrieve the moab assemblies of components included in the build project. Using the moab assemblies, the application service can determine what materials are needed at what location and when, and also determine what tasks must be performed and when. The application service can display the tasks for the build project, and the materials needed for the tasks, in a user-friendly format. In one example, the application service can display tasks and materials by work phase of the build project.