Mobile Device Accessory State Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile computing devices face processing and resource limitations when connected to multiple accessories, leading to interoperability challenges and inefficient resource management.

Innovation Solution

The mobile computing device actively manages the states of connected accessories, deactivating them based on events such as user requests, resource thresholds, or conflicting standards to optimize resource allocation and reduce computational load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple accessories are connected to the mobile computing device, then the device can provide more functionality and interoperability, but the processing load and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessory interoperabilityVSAvoidprocessing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the active/inactive state of accessories based on real-time conditions. The mobile computing device monitors resource availability and triggering events, then dynamically transitions accessories between active and inactive states to optimize the balance between functionality and processing load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of accessories by transitioning them between active and inactive states. This parameter change allows the system to adjust the number of simultaneously operating accessories based on resource constraints and triggering events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple accessories are simultaneously active, then more functions can be performed, but resource conflicts and incompatibility issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional outputVSAvoidaccessory compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of accessory compatibility and resource requirements before allowing multiple accessories to become active. When a new accessory connects or a triggering event occurs, the system proactively assesses potential conflicts and deactivates incompatible accessories beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the operational state of accessories and provides feedback to adjust their active/inactive status. When resource conflicts or incompatibility is detected, the system receives feedback about the current state and automatically deactivates problematic accessories to maintain system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the mobile computing device manages accessory states manually, then user control is maximized, but the complexity of operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidstate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically managing accessory activation and deactivation based on triggering events and resource availability. The mobile computing device independently monitors conditions and adjusts accessory states without requiring manual user intervention, reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to automatically respond to changing conditions. When triggering events occur or resource thresholds are exceeded, the system receives feedback about the current state and automatically adjusts accessory activation, eliminating the need for complex manual management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Stability of the object's composition

If accessories remain active continuously, then connectivity is maintained, but energy consumption and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions accessories between active and inactive states based on triggering events and resource availability. This dynamic state change allows the system to maintain connection stability when needed while reducing energy consumption during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic monitoring of triggering events and resource conditions to determine when to activate or deactivate accessories. This periodic action allows the system to maintain stability when required while conserving energy during extended idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9338276B2Gating accessory connection
Publication Date: 2016.05.10 APPLE INC
  • US9338276B2 patent drawing
  • US9338276B2 patent drawing
  • US9338276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention can manage the activity of accessories connected to a mobile computing device. A mobile computing device can be connected to any number of accessories through wireless or physical connections. Processing and resource limitations at the mobile computing device limit the number of accessories that can feasibly interoperate with the mobile computing device at any one time. In some embodiments, a threshold value is placed on the number of accessories with which a mobile computing device can interoperate at any one time. This threshold value can depend on the types of accessories, the application(s) executing on the mobile computing device, the processing power, whether media output resource are being used, etc. In response to a threshold number of accessories being connected, the mobile computing device can deactivate accessories.