Mobile Impact Attenuator Deployment for Predicted Collision Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle impact attenuators are not mobile or autonomous, failing to effectively mitigate potential collisions without human intervention, as they are typically stationary and cannot adapt to changing collision risks or redirect vehicles to prevent accidents.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous mobile attenuator system that deploys mobile impact attenuators to predicted locations based on collision risk assessments from sensors, using patterns like triangular or linear configurations to dissipate kinetic energy and potentially redirect errant vehicles, equipped with processors for real-time risk analysis and deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If stationary impact attenuators are used, then kinetic energy can be dissipated through sand scattering, but the system cannot adapt to changing collision risks or move to predicted locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing collision risksVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impact attenuator is transformed from a stationary to a mobile system by equipping it with a vehicle platform, propulsion system, and positioning components. This allows the attenuator to dynamically relocate to predicted collision locations based on real-time risk assessment from sensor data, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by making the system mobile rather than fixed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs autonomous operation where the processor independently analyzes sensor data, determines collision risk, selects optimal deployment locations, and controls the mobile attenuator's movement without human intervention. This self-service capability enables the system to adapt to changing conditions automatically while maintaining manageable complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If mobile attenuators are deployed autonomously, then the system can respond to dynamic collision risks, but the extent of automation increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous deployment capabilityVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mobile attenuator platform integrates multiple functions into a single system: sensor data acquisition, collision risk analysis, location prediction, navigation, and impact attenuation. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what would otherwise require separate systems, while enabling high程度的 automation through unified control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback where sensors continuously monitor the environment, the processor analyzes data and adjusts the attenuator's position and deployment strategy in real-time based on changing collision risks. This feedback mechanism enables autonomous operation by allowing the system to self-correct and adapt without human intervention, managing complexity through intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If sand-filled barrels are used to dissipate kinetic energy, then vehicle deceleration is smoothed, but the attenuators cannot redirect vehicles or respond to errant vehicles in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of vehicle redirectionVSAvoidredirection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attenuator system uses mobile positioning mechanisms including steerable wheels or tracks to dynamically redirect errant vehicles by adjusting its orientation and position in response to real-time sensor data. This dynamic redirection capability replaces static sand-barrel arrangements, enabling active vehicle guidance while managing complexity through standardized mobile platform components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary deployment by positioning the mobile attenuator at predicted collision locations before actual impact occurs. Sensors detect potential errant vehicles, the processor calculates optimal interception points, and the attenuator relocates in advance to prepare for energy dissipation or vehicle redirection, enabling proactive safety intervention rather than reactive response

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively mitigates potential vehicle collisions by deploying mobile attenuators to high-risk areas, reducing the risk of injury by dissipating kinetic energy and potentially redirecting vehicles, thereby enhancing safety in dynamic collision scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

when a vehicle collides with the barrels they shatter, the kinetic energy of the vehicle is dissipated by scattering the sand, and the vehicle decelerates smoothly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy dissipation through sand scattering:

Data Source

PatentUS10995462B2Autonomous mobile attenuator system
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10995462B2 patent drawing
  • US10995462B2 patent drawing
  • US10995462B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to an autonomous mobile attenuator system for mitigating vehicular collisions. The system includes one or more mobile attenuators that receive data indicating a need for deployment from one or more sensors. The one or more mobile attenuators perform a collision risk assessment on the received data to determine a probability of a potential vehicle collision. The one or more mobile attenuators determine the probability of the potential vehicle collision exceeds a predetermined risk threshold value. The one or more mobile attenuators determine a predicted location for the potential vehicle collision. The one or more mobile attenuators proceed to the predicted location to mitigate the potential vehicle collision.