Mobile Bin Carrier Sortation for High-Capacity Multi-Pass Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object processing systems, particularly in distribution centers, face inefficiencies and inflexibilities due to the need for a large number of collection bins, which increases physical space, capital, and operating costs. These systems struggle to efficiently sort and process a variety of objects of different sizes and weights.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution is a bin exchange system that utilizes automated carriers moving on an array of track sections. This system includes input, processing, and output stations for bin exchange, allowing for remote movement and efficient processing of objects between bins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of collection bins are used to sort all objects to all destinations at once, then the sortation capacity and number of diverts increase, but the physical space requirements, capital costs, and operating costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation capacityVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sortation process is divided into multiple passes, with each pass handling a subset of destinations. Objects are sorted in stages rather than all at once, allowing the system to achieve high sortation capacity with a limited number of physical bins at any given time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures bin assignments between passes. Collection bins are reassigned to different destination groups in subsequent passes, allowing the same physical bins to serve multiple destinations over time, thereby reducing the total number of bins needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If human workers manually sort objects to collection bins, then labor flexibility is maintained, but system throughput is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor flexibilityVSAvoidsystem throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated scanning and identification to determine object destinations, with objects being automatically directed to the correct bins. This reduces reliance on human decision-making speed while maintaining operational simplicity, thereby increasing throughput without sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An automated control system acts as an intermediary between object identification and physical sortation. The control system processes destination information and directs sortation actions, enabling faster throughput while keeping the physical sortation process simple and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then throughput increases, but the system complexity and mechanical costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex tilt tray mechanism from the sortation system and replaces it with simpler divert mechanisms. Objects are moved along a conveyor and diverted to stationary bins using less complex mechanical means, maintaining throughput while reducing system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using expensive recirculating tilt tray systems, the patent employs multiple simpler conveyor segments that replicate basic transport and divert functions. This achieves similar throughput using less complex, more cost-effective components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of operation

If bins are arranged within efficient reach of human workers, then ease of operation is maintained, but the number of diverts is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker accessibilityVSAvoidnumber of diverts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Collection bins serve multiple destinations across different passes rather than being dedicated to single destinations. Each bin is reassigned to different destination groups in subsequent passes, allowing a small number of accessible bins to handle a large total number of diverts through multi-functional use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250128880A1Bin infeed and removal systems and methods for processing objects including mobile matrix carrier systems
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US20250128880A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128880A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128880A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bin exchange system is disclosed that includes a plurality of automated carriers, each of which is adapted to be remotely movable on an array of track sections, at least one input station by which bins may be introduced to the array of track sections, at least one processing station in communication with the array of track sections wherein objects may be moved between bins, and at least one output station by which bins may be removed from the array of track sections.