Mobile Cleaning Robot With Robotic Arm and Modular Tooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cleaning processes in buildings rely heavily on manual labor, which is costly and expected to increase, with limited automation available for tasks that do not require human intervention.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system comprising a transportation assembly, a robotic arm, and a control system that allows the robot to move to specific stations and perform tasks by communicating with the transportation and robotic arm systems to execute a series of operations, including using various cleaning tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual labor is used for cleaning tasks, then flexibility and adaptability to various cleaning scenarios are maintained, but labor costs increase and automation is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of cleaning tasksVSAvoidcomplexity of robotic system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is divided into distinct modular components: a mobile base platform, a robotic arm assembly, interchangeable cleaning tool modules, and separate control systems. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and facilitates easier maintenance and upgrades, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high automation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system employs a universal robotic arm and standardized interface that can accommodate multiple types of cleaning tools (vacuum attachments, polishing pads, spraying mechanisms, etc.). This multi-functionality allows a single robotic platform to perform various cleaning tasks, reducing the need for multiple specialized systems and lowering overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a robotic arm is added to the transportation assembly, then task execution capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution capabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of robotic arm integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm assembly is integrated within the mobile base platform, with the arm nested on the base and tool modules nested on the arm. This hierarchical nesting allows compact configuration while maintaining full functionality of each component, improving task execution capability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm incorporates multiple degrees of freedom with adjustable joints and movable links, enabling dynamic positioning and adaptation to various cleaning scenarios. This dynamic capability allows the arm to reach different positions and orientations, significantly improving versatility while the modular joint design keeps individual components manageable in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If advanced navigation and control mechanisms are implemented, then cleaning efficiency is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates sensors (cameras, proximity sensors, encoders) that provide real-time feedback on robot position, arm orientation, and tool contact forces. This feedback enables closed-loop control for precise positioning and adaptive cleaning operations, significantly improving cleaning efficiency while using commercially available sensor technology rather than custom complex systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical navigation mechanisms with electronic control and software-based path planning. The robotic base uses motorized wheels controlled by electronic speed controllers, and the robotic arm uses servo motors with electronic position feedback, substituting purely mechanical systems with electromechanical systems that are easier to control and program, thereby improving efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11407118B1Robot for performing dextrous tasks and related methods and systems
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 AUGENBRAUN JOSEPH E
  • US11407118B1 patent drawing
  • US11407118B1 patent drawing
  • US11407118B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot having a transportation assembly, a robotic arm, and control systems is disclosed. A positioning control system for the robot is configured to communicate with the transportation assembly to provide commands to the transportation assembly such that the robot moves to a plurality of stations or along a path during the task. A robotic arm control system for the robot is configured to communicate with the robotic arm to provide commands to the robotic arm such that the robotic arm performs a series of operations to complete a task specific to a station or along the path.