Mobile Device Authorization via Biometric Cryptographic Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for preventing theft and securing mobile devices in facilities are labor-intensive, prone to manipulation, and inadequate for ensuring the authenticity of devices entering or exiting, particularly in environments where network access is limited.

Innovation Solution

A system that involves requesting authorization, validating requests through local or remote systems, and verifying devices using proximity-based methods, such as pattern matching and location-specific validation, to ensure that only authorized devices access facilities, with additional security measures like multifactor authentication and audit trails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stickers are used as verification method, then device authorization can be tracked, but the system becomes prone to manipulation and stickers can be transferred or forged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice authorization verificationVSAvoidauthorization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical sticker-based verification system with an electronic authentication system using biometric sensors (fingerprint, facial recognition) and cryptographic protocols. This substitution eliminates the physical manipulation vulnerabilities of stickers while maintaining authorization tracking through digital records and blockchain technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the authorization verification process, replacing physical stickers with electronic tokens and cryptographic signatures. These digital copies can be validated remotely and cannot be physically transferred or forged, solving the manipulation issue while reducing system complexity through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If thorough validation of every device is performed, then security is improved, but the process becomes too time consuming to be effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity validationVSAvoiddevice entry/exit processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary validation by pre-registering devices with unique identifiers and cryptographic keys before they enter the facility. This preliminary action allows for rapid verification at entry/exit points without time-consuming manual checks, as the authentication data is already prepared and stored securely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service authentication where devices automatically present their cryptographic credentials and biometric data for verification. The system autonomously validates these credentials against stored records, eliminating the need for manual intervention and significantly speeding up the processing while maintaining thorough security validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If random selection for thorough validation is used, then some deterrent effect is achieved, but it may be considered an acceptable risk by thieves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation process simplicityVSAvoidtheft prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the random selection mechanism with deterministic cryptographic verification. Every device passage is automatically authenticated using unique cryptographic keys and biometric data, providing consistent and reliable theft prevention rather than relying on random deterrence. This electronic substitution ensures that no device can pass without proper authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If EAS tags are used to mark authorized devices, then device tracking is improved, but tags can be transferred between devices and interfere with device operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice tracking accuracyVSAvoiddevice operation interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical EAS tags with electronic cryptographic authentication embedded in the device's operating system and hardware security modules. This substitution eliminates the physical interference issues of tags while maintaining accurate device tracking through digital identifiers and blockchain-based authorization records that cannot be transferred between devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11069164B2System for managing mobile devices
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 VIZPIN INC
  • US11069164B2 patent drawing
  • US11069164B2 patent drawing
  • US11069164B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile device verification method for a facility includes the mobile device requesting authorization to permit entry to and/or exit from the facility, validating the mobile device request, and verifying, as a mobile device enters and exits the facility, that the mobile device is the mobile device whose authorization request was validated.