Mobile Device Location Alert Management for Power Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current location-based services lack efficient mechanisms for triggering location-based alerts on mobile devices, particularly in managing geo-fences and optimizing alert frequency, which can lead to unnecessary data usage and fraudulent transaction detection challenges.

Innovation Solution

A mobile device system that includes an alert module, a network interface, and a processor to generate location alerts based on predefined rules, using GPS, cell tower triangulation, or Wi-Fi hotspots, and an alert management server that connects with third-party service providers to manage location monitoring rules and trigger alerts when a device crosses a geo-fence or exceeds time/distance thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If location-based alerts are generated frequently to improve fraud detection accuracy, then security reliability is improved, but power consumption and data usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts alert generation frequency and location monitoring intensity based on contextual factors such as device movement patterns, time of day, and risk profiles. The processor determines whether to generate alerts based on dynamic evaluation of multiple parameters including distance thresholds, time intervals, and geo-fence boundary crossings, rather than using fixed frequent monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes monitoring parameters such as distance thresholds, time intervals, and alert triggers based on contextual conditions. The processor adjusts location update frequency and alert generation parameters dynamically, modifying them according to device state, user behavior patterns, and security risk assessments to optimize between detection accuracy and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If location monitoring is continuous to improve tracking accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation tracking accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic location monitoring with variable intervals rather than continuous monitoring. The processor determines location update frequency based on time intervals, distance thresholds, and geo-fence boundaries, generating alerts only when predefined periodic conditions are met, such as when the device crosses a geo-fence boundary or after a specified time elapsed since the last alert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring by selectively monitoring location based on contextual relevance. Rather than continuously tracking all movements, the processor focuses monitoring efforts on significant location changes such as crossing geo-fence boundaries, exceeding distance thresholds, or entering high-risk areas, thereby achieving adequate tracking accuracy with reduced power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If alert thresholds are set low to improve fraud detection sensitivity, then detection capability is improved, but false alerts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alert rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where alert generation is based on multiple evaluated parameters including time elapsed, distance traveled, geo-fence boundary status, and device movement patterns. The processor uses feedback from these various conditions to determine whether to generate an alert, adjusting the decision based on the combination of factors rather than relying on a single low threshold, thereby reducing false alerts while maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If multiple location checking methods are used to improve accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple location determination methods (GPS, cell tower triangulation, Wi-Fi hotspots) into a universal location monitoring framework. The processor selectively employs different location checking methods based on availability, accuracy requirements, and power consumption considerations, allowing the system to achieve high measurement precision when needed while maintaining operational simplicity through unified management of multiple techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10616717B2Mobile device that generates location-based alerts in a power efficient manner
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 ZUMIGO INC
  • US10616717B2 patent drawing
  • US10616717B2 patent drawing
  • US10616717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A location alert management server includes a storage device in which user data is stored, the user data including tokens, each of which is stored in association with a mobile device and an application of a service provider that is installed in the mobile device, and a processor that determines, in response to a first location alert and based on a first token included in the first location alert, that the first location alert is issued by a first mobile device that has installed therein a first application of a first service provider, and issues a second location alert for transmission to a server of the first service provider. The first mobile device issues the first location alert according to location monitoring rules of the first service provider which are stored in the first mobile device, and the second location alert includes identifying information of the first mobile device.