Mobile Device Pattern Detection for Proximity Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for proximity detection between mobile devices and related objects, such as holsters or containers, often require additional hardware like magnetic or RFID sensors, increasing device complexity and cost, and are limited to dedicated applications.

Innovation Solution

A mobile device with an input module and pattern detection module that uses standard input devices to discern and respond to predetermined patterns, allowing for proximity detection without additional sensors, by processing information to detect non-naturally occurring patterns associated with related objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional hardware (magnetic sensor, RFID sensor) is added to the mobile device for proximity detection, then detection reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity detection reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing display serve multiple functions: it acts as both a visual output device and a proximity sensor. By detecting touch patterns on the display surface, the system determines whether the device is in a holster or being held, eliminating the need for dedicated proximity sensors while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The display surface itself performs the sensing function without requiring external sensors. The capacitive properties of the display enable it to detect the presence and pattern of objects placed upon it, allowing the device to self-detect its environment using its own components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional hardware (magnetic sensor, RFID sensor) is added to the mobile device for proximity detection, then proximity detection capability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity detection capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The display serves dual purposes as both visual output and proximity sensing interface, eliminating the need for separate sensor components and reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects changes in capacitive parameters of the display surface to determine proximity states. By monitoring electrical properties rather than using physical sensors, the solution reduces component count and manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If additional hardware (magnetic sensor, RFID sensor) is added to the mobile device for proximity detection, then proximity detection accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The display's inherent capacitive properties are used for sensing without requiring active power-consuming sensors. The detection leverages the display's own electrical characteristics, enabling passive sensing that consumes minimal additional power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in electrical parameters of the display surface to detect proximity events. This approach uses the display's existing electrical properties rather than activating additional power-hungry sensing hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If standard input devices are used for pattern detection instead of additional sensors, then device complexity is reduced, but detection precision may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidpattern detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines specific touch patterns that correspond to holster placement. By establishing predetermined patterns beforehand, the system can accurately distinguish holster detection from normal usage without requiring complex real-time analysis, maintaining precision while using simple hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2527955B1Proximity detection between a mobile device and a related object
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 BLACKBERRY LTD
  • EP2527955B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2527955B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2527955B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are provided related to proximity detection between a mobile device and a related object or device, such as a holder, holster, pocket liner, support surface, or the like. A pattern is associated with the related object, for example printed on a surface thereof, the pattern being discernable by a mobile device input module, such as a touch surface or optical navigation module. When the pattern is presented to the input module, the mobile device detects the pattern and may respond accordingly, for example by shifting to a standby mode or suppressing mobile device inputs.