Mobile Device Automated Retail Checkout and Return System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional checkout and return processes in retail environments are inefficient, requiring customers to wait in lines and often involving manual handling and staff intervention, leading to a less than ideal customer experience.

Innovation Solution

An automated system utilizing a mobile device for point-of-sale transactions and product returns, where each product has a unique identifier tag and security device, allowing customers to purchase and return products at their respective locations without the need for centralized checkout or customer service representatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If centralized checkout register is used, then payment processing can be completed, but customers have to wait in line and spend time in checkout

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckout processing speedVSAvoidcustomer waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized checkout process into individual product-level transactions. Each product has its own point of sale at its location, allowing customers to purchase items individually as they shop rather than collecting all items and checking out centrally. This segmentation eliminates the need for long checkout lines while maintaining payment processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional centralized checkout model to a multi-dimensional distributed checkout system. Payment points are distributed across multiple locations throughout the store (at each product location), creating a spatial dimension that eliminates the temporal bottleneck of centralized checkout lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If centralized checkout is staffed by employees, then checkout can be performed, but customer experience deteriorates due to waiting in line

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckout convenienceVSAvoidtime spent in checkout line
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through mobile devices that customers use to scan product identifiers and complete purchases independently. Customers serve themselves by initiating transactions at product locations without requiring staff intervention at centralized checkout, thereby eliminating waiting time while maintaining operational convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual checkout (customers physically bringing items to centralized registers) with an automated electronic system using mobile devices and wireless communication. This substitution eliminates the physical movement and waiting associated with traditional checkout while maintaining the payment function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If customer service staff handle returns, then product returns can be processed, but customers must wait in line reducing customer experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn processing efficiencyVSAvoidcustomer waiting time for returns
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service for product returns through the same mobile device used for purchases. Customers can initiate return transactions independently without queuing at customer service desks, thereby maintaining return processing capability while eliminating waiting time and improving customer experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If product identifiers are scanned at centralized checkout, then purchase tracking is accurate, but the process requires serial processing reducing speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct identification accuracyVSAvoidcheckout processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the product identification process from centralized checkout to distributed product locations. Each product maintains its unique identifier at its location, and scanning occurs independently at each product point rather than in a centralized serial process, thereby maintaining accuracy while enabling parallel processing and improving speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9911107B2Automated secure check-out and drop-off return of products using mobile device
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 INTEL CORP
  • US9911107B2 patent drawing
  • US9911107B2 patent drawing
  • US9911107B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generally, this disclosure describes a method and system for automated check-out and drop-off return of products using a mobile device. A method may include purchasing at least one product of a plurality of products wherein each product is located at a respective associated product location in a store that sells the plurality of products and a point of sale of each purchased product corresponds to the respective associated product location.