Mobile Device Speed Detection for Driver Distraction Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Driver distractions caused by operating mobile electronic devices while driving lead to traffic accidents, particularly among inexperienced drivers, as they are prone to accidents while talking, dialing, or accessing messages, diverting attention from the road.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a position determining component within mobile electronic devices to detect speed and restrict functionality if exceeding a threshold, preventing distracting operations such as dialing or texting by disabling keypads, generating audible warnings, or shutting down the device to ensure safe driving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mobile electronic device functionality is fully available during driving, then ease of operation is improved, but driver safety deteriorates due to distractions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts device functionality based on real-time speed detection. When the vehicle is stationary or moving slowly, full device functionality is available. When the vehicle exceeds a threshold speed, the system automatically restricts functionality to prevent driver distraction, thus adapting the ease of operation parameter to the driving condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the mobile electronic device based on vehicle speed. By detecting speed as a physical parameter and using it to modify device functionality parameters (such as disabling keypad, restricting applications), the system resolves the contradiction between ease of operation and driver safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If device functionality is restricted when speed exceeds threshold, then driver safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction mechanism is dynamic rather than static. The system continuously monitors vehicle speed and adjusts device functionality in real-time. This dynamic approach ensures that ease of operation is maintained when safe (vehicle stationary or slow) while automatically prioritizing driver safety when speed exceeds the threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where vehicle speed information is continuously fed back to the functionality control module. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust device accessibility based on current driving conditions, resolving the contradiction by linking ease of operation to actual safety conditions through real-time monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If speed detection and functionality restriction system is implemented, then driver distraction is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver distractionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multiple functions through integrated components. The position determining component serves dual purposes: it provides location information and enables speed detection for safety control. The functionality control module integrates speed threshold comparison and automatic restriction logic, reducing the need for separate dedicated components and thereby minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mobile electronic device performs self-monitoring and self-restriction based on vehicle speed. The device automatically detects its own operational context through integrated sensors and autonomously adjusts its functionality without requiring external intervention or complex external control systems, thus resolving the contradiction by keeping the added complexity within the device itself rather than requiring additional external infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8559934B2Method and system for limiting the functionality of a mobile electronic device
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LTD
  • US8559934B2 patent drawing
  • US8559934B2 patent drawing
  • US8559934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for assuring compliance with a mandated requirement, a control component resident in said mobile electronic device is implemented in response to receiving an indication to limit the operation of the mobile electronic device in a moving vehicle. A position determining component disposed within the mobile electronic device is used to determine the speed of the mobile electronic device. The speed of the mobile electronic device is determined to exceed a speed threshold and the functionality of the mobile electronic device is restricted based upon the determination that the speed threshold has been exceeded.