Mobile Device Usage Control via Conditional Feature Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile devices often cause distractions in public and corporate environments due to their connectivity, leading to interruptions and misuse, as users may inadvertently receive messages or calls during meetings or while away from the office, making it difficult for companies to control attendance and maintain focus.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for controlling device usage by implementing policies that inhibit specific features during predetermined restricted periods, using triggers to initiate rules and restrict the use of features such as phone calls, emails, and games in mobile devices, ensuring minimal disruption during meetings or designated work hours.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mobile device connectivity is provided to users, then user convenience and accessibility are improved, but device misuse and distractions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoiddistractions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by automatically disabling selected features before the restricted period begins. The trigger mechanism is pre-configured to execute the feature inhibition rules at the start of the restricted period, ensuring that distractions are prevented before they can occur during meetings or work hours.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making feature availability time-dependent. Features are dynamically enabled or disabled based on the current time relative to the restricted period. The trigger mechanism continuously monitors time and automatically adjusts feature availability, allowing full functionality during permissible times and restricting access during restricted periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If users can access emails and communications on mobile devices, then productivity is maintained, but attendance control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework continuityVSAvoidattendance control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing device features into distinct categories (e.g., communication features vs. productivity features). The policy mechanism allows selective inhibition of specific feature categories during restricted periods, enabling companies to control which functions are available and thus maintain both productivity and attendance control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements local quality by applying different access levels to different features based on their nature and business requirements. Critical business communication features may remain enabled while social media or gaming features are disabled. The trigger mechanism ensures that feature availability is locally optimized for each user's specific needs and company policy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If feature inhibition rules are applied during restricted periods, then distractions are reduced, but device functionality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedistractionsVSAvoiddevice functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-configuring which features should be inhibited during restricted periods. Users can advance-select their preferences before the restricted period begins, and the trigger mechanism automatically executes these pre-planned restrictions, reducing the need for manual intervention and ensuring consistent application of distraction-prevention rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring and tracking feature usage patterns. The trigger mechanism can detect when features are being accessed during restricted periods and provide feedback to users or administrators. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from usage patterns and automatically adjust feature availability to better balance distraction prevention with necessary functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP1845695B1System and method for controlling device usage
Publication Date: 2009.03.11 BLACKBERRY LTD
  • EP1845695B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1845695B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1845695B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Mobile device usage may be monitored and restricted by pushing enabling/disabling events from an administrator the device. The events impose a certain set of rules that can "lock" certain features provided by the device, according to permissions and preestablished policies, for a certain period of time. Such restricted periods may coincide with meetings or other events in which distractions should be kept to a minimum or be during regular, predetermined time periods. Preferably, the rules include conditional locks that allow a user to use a feature a reasonable number of times before the lock is activated to place the onus on the user for minimizing such distractions, while enabling the user to maintain access to such a vital communication tool. Cancel packets may also be used to not only control but to monitor the application of the rule sets and when certain conditions are breaches, which provides an employer with sufficient information to use in auditing device usage or in reprimanding users for misuse of a privilege such as the use of mobile data communications devices.