Mobile Drive Unit Acceleration Control for Payload Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Maintaining stability and traction of a mobile drive unit as it moves and stops is challenging due to changes in acceleration and direction, which can cause tilting or loss of contact with the surface, particularly when carrying a payload.

Innovation Solution

A mobile drive unit with a hinged chassis and suspension system, including casters and ballasts, along with a motion control system that implements laden linear and angular acceleration controls to adjust movement parameters and ensure stability and traction, by limiting acceleration based on payload mass and aligning casters with the direction of travel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If acceleration is increased to improve productivity, then speed and productivity are improved, but stability and traction are worsened due to tilting and loss of contact with the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespeedVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts acceleration limits based on real-time operating conditions including payload mass, terrain characteristics, and drive unit state. The controller continuously modifies acceleration parameters to maintain stability while maximizing productivity, rather than using fixed acceleration limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters such as acceleration limits, velocity profiles, and caster alignment angles based on detected conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system resolves the contradiction between high speed and stability for different operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If acceleration is increased to improve productivity, then speed is improved, but traction is worsened due to loss of contact with the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespeedVSAvoidtraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-aligning casters with the intended direction of travel before acceleration occurs. This preliminary alignment prevents lateral forces that would cause loss of contact and maintains traction during subsequent acceleration phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses feedback from sensors detecting drive unit motion, terrain conditions, and caster alignment to continuously adjust acceleration commands. This closed-loop control ensures traction is maintained while achieving high productivity by preventing wheel lift and slip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If direction changes are made quickly to improve productivity, then maneuverability is improved, but stability is worsened due to tilting and loss of contact

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts directional change parameters including turn radius, angular velocity, and acceleration limits based on real-time conditions. This allows the drive unit to navigate efficiently while maintaining stability through adaptive control of maneuvering parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system handles multiple functions including linear acceleration, directional turning, caster alignment, and stability control through a unified control architecture. This multi-functional approach coordinates all movements to maintain stability during complex maneuvering sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If caster alignment is adjusted to improve stability during turns, then traction is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetractionVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The caster alignment system operates autonomously through active control, automatically adjusting caster angles based on detected drive unit motion and terrain conditions without requiring manual intervention. This self-adjusting mechanism maintains traction while keeping the control system relatively simple through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11029695B2Acceleration controls for a mobile drive unit
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11029695B2 patent drawing
  • US11029695B2 patent drawing
  • US11029695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Motion controls for a mobile drive unit adjust linear acceleration for laden mobile drive units to decrease the likelihood of the payload tipping or bouncing off the mobile drive unit and adjust angular acceleration to reduce the risk of the drive wheels slipping while the casters align with the direction of travel.