Mobile Event Device Analysis for Single-User Fault Diagnosis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing alarm systems in large facilities require costly and inefficient manual testing by multiple users, often leading to misdiagnosis and increased maintenance time due to the need for separate personnel to operate control panels and event devices, and issues may not be legible on the control panel interface.
Innovation Solution
A mobile device with a user interface is used to connect to a control panel, allowing a single user to perform event device analysis, control operations, and diagnose faults through a diagnostic guide, duplicating the control panel interface and providing language adaptation based on location.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual testing is performed by multiple users operating control panels and event devices separately, then the alarm system can be tested, but the maintenance cost increases and maintenance time is extended
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines the functions of multiple users (control panel operator and event device tester) into a single user interface. The mobile device merges these separate operational roles, allowing one user to simultaneously control the panel and test devices, thereby reducing maintenance time and personnel requirements while maintaining testing reliability
Solution Approach 2:
The mobile device serves as an intermediary between the user and the alarm system components. It mediates the interaction by providing a unified interface that communicates with both the control panel and event devices, eliminating the need for multiple direct connections and operations
2Reliability
If manual testing is performed by multiple users, then the alarm system can be tested, but the maintenance cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines the functions of multiple users (control panel operator and event device tester) into a single user interface. The mobile device merges these separate operational roles, allowing one user to simultaneously control the panel and test devices, thereby reducing maintenance time and personnel requirements while maintaining testing reliability
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables self-service testing through the mobile device interface, which automatically coordinates between the control panel and event devices. The single user can independently perform complete testing sequences without requiring coordination with multiple personnel, reducing maintenance operational costs
3Loss of information
If control panel interface is used for diagnostics, then alarm system status can be monitored, but issues may not be legible and require additional personnel
Solution Approach 1:
The mobile device creates a copied and enhanced version of the control panel interface. It replicates the diagnostic information display while adding improved legibility and accessibility features, allowing a single user to clearly view and interpret diagnostic data without requiring additional personnel at the original control panel
Data Source
AI summary
Devices, systems, and methods for event device operation are described herein. In some examples, one or more embodiments include a mobile device comprising a user interface, a memory, and a processor to execute instructions stored in the memory to receive a signal from a control panel of a control system in response to the mobile device connecting to the control panel, generate, based on the signal, an event device analysis for a number of event devices included in the control system, display, via the user interface, the event device analysis, in response to a selection of a fault corresponding to an event device from the list of event devices having faults, display a diagnostic guide to remedy the fault, and control, in response to an input to the user interface, at least one of operation of the control panel and an event device of the number of event devices.