Automated Unloading Control for Mobile Farm Implements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile farm implements face challenges in automating the unloading process, particularly in determining optimal conditions such as speed and weight thresholds for efficient and safe unloading, and in communicating with various devices using different communication protocols.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize sensors to measure speed and weight, and a processor to control the conveyor and container door operations, allowing for automated unloading and communication with multiple farm implements using different protocols, enabling wireless data collection and chute position automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the unloading process is automated using sensors and processors to control conveyor and container door operations, then operational efficiency and safety are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunloading efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into separate functional modules: speed sensors measure cart velocity, weight sensors monitor material load, processors analyze sensor data and determine optimal unloading conditions, and control actuators execute commands for conveyor and door operations. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, improving overall system efficiency while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The unloading system operates autonomously by continuously monitoring speed and weight parameters, automatically determining when unloading conditions are optimal, and controlling the conveyor and container door without operator intervention. The system serves itself by using sensor feedback to make real-time decisions about when to initiate, continue, or terminate unloading operations, thereby enhancing productivity while reducing the need for complex manual control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication protocols are supported for communicating with diverse farm implements, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication compatibilityVSAvoidprotocol handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates multiple communication protocol handlers within a single processor unit, enabling the same hardware platform to interface with various farm implements using different protocols (e.g., CAN bus, ISO 11783 Isobus, wireless protocols). This multi-functionality allows the system to adapt to diverse equipment without requiring separate dedicated communication modules for each protocol, thereby enhancing versatility while containing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary layer between the control system and various farm implements, translating between different communication protocols and the internal control logic. This mediator approach allows the system to maintain a standardized internal interface while supporting multiple external protocol standards, improving adaptability without directly exposing protocol-specific complexity to the operational control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If speed and weight thresholds are set to ensure safe and efficient unloading, then reliability is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunloading safetyVSAvoidspeed and weight measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors speed and weight parameters during operation and compares real-time measurements against predetermined threshold values. When measurements indicate that unloading conditions are met (speed within acceptable range and weight above threshold), the system automatically initiates or continues unloading. This feedback mechanism enhances reliability by ensuring unloading only occurs under safe and efficient conditions, while the use of clear threshold criteria reduces the need for extremely high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system adjusts operational parameters dynamically based on measured conditions: it activates unloading when speed falls within a target range and weight exceeds a threshold, and terminates unloading when weight drops below the threshold or speed becomes unsafe. By defining operational boundaries through parameter thresholds rather than requiring continuous precise control, the system improves reliability while accommodating practical measurement limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10028441B2Method for controlling an unload operation on a mobile farm implement
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 UNVERFERTH MFG CO INC
  • US10028441B2 patent drawing
  • US10028441B2 patent drawing
  • US10028441B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of automating unloading for a mobile farm implement is presented. The method includes determining whether the speed of the mobile farm implement is below a first threshold. In response to a determination that the speed of the mobile farm implement is below the first threshold, a conveyor is moved to an operating position, where it is used to unload agricultural material from the mobile farm implement. Upon termination of the unloading of the agricultural material, the controller folds the conveyor to a storage or transport position.