Mobile Fleet Maintenance Robot for Autonomous Vehicle Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Commercial fleet vehicle operators face challenges in efficiently performing maintenance tasks such as visual inspections and maintenance operations, especially with the rise of electric vehicles, as drivers are often specialized technicians and maintenance requires significant time and resources.

Innovation Solution

Deployment of autonomous robots equipped with sensors, actuators, and modular platforms for navigation, inspection, and maintenance tasks, including tire pressure adjustment, charging, and other operations, utilizing SLAM for mapping and neural networks for object detection, enabling autonomous operation and data-driven maintenance decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If drivers perform visual inspection and maintenance tasks, then vehicle maintenance can be conducted, but driver time and operational efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle maintenance efficiencyVSAvoiddriver time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables vehicles to perform self-inspection through onboard sensors and cameras that automatically detect damages, tire pressure issues, and other maintenance needs without human intervention. The vehicle essentially inspects itself, freeing drivers from these tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inspection and maintenance tasks performed by drivers are replaced by an automated robotic inspection system with sensors, cameras, and computer vision algorithms that conduct visual inspections, tire pressure checks, and maintenance assessments autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If specialized technicians perform maintenance tasks, then maintenance quality improves, but operational costs and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance qualityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables vehicles to perform self-inspection through onboard sensors and cameras that automatically detect damages, tire pressure issues, and other maintenance needs without human intervention. The vehicle essentially inspects itself, freeing drivers from these tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects data from sensors, cameras, and vehicle systems, processes this information through computer vision and machine learning algorithms, and provides real-time feedback about vehicle condition. This automated feedback loop ensures consistent maintenance quality without requiring specialized technician intervention for routine inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If manual inspection methods are used, then implementation is simple, but inspection accuracy and detection precision are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddamage detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Manual inspection and maintenance tasks performed by drivers are replaced by an automated robotic inspection system with sensors, cameras, and computer vision algorithms that conduct visual inspections, tire pressure checks, and maintenance assessments autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies and models of vehicle conditions through photogrammetry and 3D scanning, generating detailed virtual representations of the vehicle exterior and interior. These digital models can be analyzed with high precision to detect damages, measure dimensions, and track changes over time without physical contact with the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If comprehensive maintenance tasks are performed, then vehicle readiness improves, but time required for maintenance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle readinessVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs inspections and identifies maintenance needs during vehicle downtime or between uses, completing comprehensive checks before the vehicle is needed again. This preliminary action ensures vehicles are ready for use without requiring time-consuming maintenance interventions when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous monitoring and inspection capabilities that operate whenever the vehicle is parked or not in use, turning otherwise idle time into productive maintenance windows. This allows comprehensive maintenance tasks to be performed continuously during downtime without affecting vehicle availability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11752631B2Fleet inspection and maintenance mobile robot
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11752631B2 patent drawing
  • US11752631B2 patent drawing
  • US11752631B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for fleet inspection and maintenance using a robot are provided. The robot may detect a maintenance issue of a vehicle of a fleet of vehicles via one or more sensors, generate a navigation route to a position proximal to the maintenance issue of the vehicle, traverse along the navigation route to the position, and execute a maintenance to rectify the maintenance issue of the vehicle. The robot may include a mobile base removably coupled to a modular platform for performing a maintenance task.