Mobile Fraud Prevention System with User-Defined Categories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud detection systems in mobile environments lack user control and proactive fraud prevention capabilities, relying on post-purchase controls and inadequate user interaction, which increases the risk of fraudulent activities and fails to provide real-time, personalized account management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented fraud prevention system that interacts with a transaction tracking system, allowing users to define categories for transactions and receive real-time notifications, enabling pre-purchase security settings, card controls, and post-purchase actions through a user interface, utilizing signature gestures for authentication and leveraging mobile device capabilities for secure authentication and notification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current fraud detection systems rely on post-purchase controls, then system complexity is reduced, but fraud prevention effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by enabling users to set pre-purchase security settings and fraud prevention rules before transactions occur. The fraud prevention system monitors transactions in real-time and can prevent fraudulent activities before they complete, rather than reacting after purchase. This includes proactive notifications to users before transactions are finalized, allowing them to prevent fraud while maintaining system simplicity through automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If fraud detection systems provide real-time notifications and user control, then user control and responsiveness are improved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidimplementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by allowing users to independently configure their own fraud prevention settings, notification preferences, and security parameters through user-friendly interfaces. Users can self-manage their account security without requiring complex system configurations or technical expertise. The automated fraud monitoring system handles the technical complexity while users simply interact with intuitive controls to define their security preferences and receive notifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the system provides comprehensive transaction monitoring and user-defined categories, then measurement precision and detection accuracy are improved, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction detection accuracyVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing transactions into user-defined categories and groups based on specific criteria such as merchant type, transaction amount, location, and time. This segmentation allows the system to monitor and analyze transactions in manageable segments rather than processing all transactions uniformly, improving detection accuracy for specific fraud patterns while reducing overall processing complexity through targeted monitoring of relevant transaction types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10510080B2Mobile fraud prevention system and method
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US10510080B2 patent drawing
  • US10510080B2 patent drawing
  • US10510080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fraud prevention system is disclosed for preventing fraudulent activity on user accounts, the fraud prevention system interacting with a transaction tracking system for allowing association of transactions with user-defined categories. The fraud prevention system may include a computer memory including at least one database storing system settings specifying account-related events that require fraud prevention action and user-defined settings specifying account-related events that require fraud prevention action, wherein at least one of the user-defined settings pertains to events falling in one of the user-defined categories. The fraud prevention system may also include at least one computer processor programmed for detecting occurrence of the account-related events, accessing the system settings and user settings in the computer memory to determine if a fraud prevention action is required in response to the detected account-related event, activating a fraud prevention user interface for the user when fraud prevention action is required, and receiving user instructions through the fraud prevention interface and processing the user instructions.