Mobile Gaming Device POS Matching via Signal Strength and RFID

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in accurately determining the proximity and matching of mobile gaming devices with Point of Sale (POS) terminals in retail environments, leading to inefficiencies in communication and transaction processes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to detect the presence and proximity of devices using signal strength analysis, RFID tags, and tie-breaking schemes to select the appropriate POS terminal for communication, ensuring efficient device interaction based on distance, employee presence, and player history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If signal strength analysis is used to determine device proximity, then device matching accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice proximity detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the device matching process into multiple independent components: signal strength analysis module, RFID tag detection module, and tie-breaking scheme module. Each component handles a specific aspect of proximity determination, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy through coordinated simple modules rather than one complex algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary matching system that mediates between mobile gaming devices and POS terminals. This intermediary layer processes signal strength data, RFID information, and applies tie-breaking schemes to resolve ambiguities, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining high matching precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple detection methods (signal strength, RFID) are combined for device matching, then matching reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice matching reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent detection methods (signal strength analysis and RFID tag detection) into a unified device matching system. By combining these methods, the system achieves higher reliability through cross-validation, where each method compensates for the weaknesses of the other, while the modular integration keeps individual component complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters dynamically by switching between different detection methods based on conditions. For example, it may prioritize signal strength analysis in open environments and RFID detection in crowded areas, adjusting the weight and threshold parameters of each method to maintain reliability while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If tie-breaking schemes are implemented to select POS terminals, then transaction accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePOS terminal selection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing priority rules and criteria for tie-breaking before actual device matching occurs. These pre-defined schemes (such as employee presence priority, player history priority) are prepared in advance, allowing the system to quickly resolve ties during transactions without complex real-time calculations, thus improving accuracy while minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If device proximity detection is enhanced with multiple criteria, then communication efficiency is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically performing device matching and POS terminal selection based on the established criteria (signal strength, RFID data, tie-breaking schemes). The process occurs without user intervention, with the system autonomously determining optimal connections and managing communication channels, thereby improving efficiency while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise matching of mobile gaming devices with POS terminals, optimizing communication channels and transaction processes by ensuring accurate device interaction based on proximity and user criteria, enhancing operational efficiency and user experience.

Implementation Method 1

Implementing a method to detect the presence and proximity of devices using signal strength analysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal strength analysis: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20210150557A1Game at cash register
Publication Date: 2021.05.20 CFPH LLC
  • US20210150557A1 patent drawing
  • US20210150557A1 patent drawing
  • US20210150557A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, a mobile gaming device may interact with a point-of-sale terminal.