Mobile ID Verification with Liveness Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increased flexibility in initiating transactions using portable computing devices has led to a higher risk of unauthorized transactions, as existing identity verification methods often require human intervention and are not adequately secure for remote transactions.

Innovation Solution

Automated systems and methods for verifying identification documents and detecting facial spoof attacks using a mobile device, which capture and analyze images of identification documents and facial features to authenticate users, reducing the need for human verification and enhancing security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated image capture and analysis is used to verify identification documents, then verification speed and productivity are improved, but measurement precision and reliability of verification may deteriorate due to inability to perform manual checks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speedVSAvoidverification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is divided into multiple independent analysis modules that each examine specific aspects of the identification document and user. These include facial recognition, document authenticity verification, liveness detection, and behavior analysis. Each module operates independently and contributes to the overall verification decision, allowing parallel processing while maintaining comprehensive verification coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts verification parameters based on risk assessment and document type. Different verification strictness levels are applied depending on the transaction amount, user profile, and detected anomalies. The system can increase scrutiny on specific parameters (such as requiring additional liveness checks) when risk indicators are detected, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving overall efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual verification by human operators is used, then reliability of verification is improved through direct observation, but device complexity and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical verification processes with automated computational analysis. Instead of human operators physically examining documents and conducting video calls, the system uses image processing algorithms, machine learning models, and automated document validation to perform verification tasks. This substitution maintains verification quality while eliminating the complexity of human operator management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An automated verification system acts as an intermediary between the user and the verification process. The system includes intermediate components such as image processing modules, liveness detection algorithms, and risk assessment systems that facilitate verification without requiring direct human intervention. These intermediary components handle the complexity of verification while presenting a simple interface to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple images are captured from different angles to verify security features, then measurement precision of security feature detection is improved, but use of energy and time for verification increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity feature detection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures multiple images from different angles only when necessary, based on risk assessment and document type. For low-risk transactions or standard documents, the system may use fewer images or alternative verification methods. For high-risk transactions or documents with complex security features, the system increases the number of captured images and analysis depth. This selective approach maintains precision when needed while reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from preliminary image analysis to determine whether additional images from different angles are necessary. After initial processing, the system assesses the quality and sufficiency of the captured images. If the preliminary analysis indicates adequate information is available, the system proceeds with verification without requiring additional images, thereby reducing energy consumption. When deficiencies are detected, the system requests supplementary images only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11669607B2ID verification with a mobile device
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 PXL VISION AG
  • US11669607B2 patent drawing
  • US11669607B2 patent drawing
  • US11669607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for remote identification of users. The system uses deep learning techniques for authenticating a user from an identification document and using automated verification of identification documents. Identification documents may be authenticated by validating security features. The system may determine features expected in a valid identification document and determine whether those features are present, employing techniques, such as determining whether direction-sensitive features are present. Liveness of a user indicated by the identification document may be determined with a deep learning model trained for identification of facial spoofing attacks.