Mobile Document Image Quality Assessment Standard

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of capturing and processing images of financial documents using mobile devices is prone to errors due to poor image quality, making it difficult to determine if the images are suitable for extracting data accurately and efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A formal and verifiable mobile document image quality and usability (MDIQU) standard is established, which assesses image quality through multiple tests and assigns a ranking to ensure images are suitable for mobile document processing applications, such as mobile check deposit and bill pay, by evaluating the image processing engine's ability to enhance image quality and extract content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple image quality assessment tests and processing methods are implemented to improve image quality, then image quality and content extraction accuracy are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidimage processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image quality assessment system is divided into multiple independent test modules, each evaluating specific quality attributes (sharpness, noise, distortion, etc.). This segmentation allows comprehensive quality assessment while maintaining modularity and manageable complexity in the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system implements a universal quality assessment framework that can evaluate multiple types of images (financial documents, checks, bills) using the same set of standardized tests. This multi-functionality approach improves measurement precision across different document types without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If image processing techniques are applied to enhance mobile document images, then content extraction accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent extraction accuracyVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment tests on captured images immediately after acquisition. Based on the assessment results, only images requiring enhancement undergo additional processing, while already high-quality images are processed quickly. This preliminary action approach improves content extraction accuracy for problematic images without unnecessarily increasing processing time for good images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system applies enhancement techniques selectively based on the specific deficiencies identified in each image. Rather than applying all possible processing methods to every image, the system applies only the necessary corrections (e.g., sharpening only for blurry images, noise reduction only for noisy images), optimizing the balance between extraction accuracy and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If comprehensive quality standards are established for mobile document images, then reliability of document processing is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument processing reliabilityVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated feedback to users through the quality assessment results, clearly indicating whether an image meets the required standards for document processing. This feedback mechanism improves reliability by ensuring only suitable images are processed, while maintaining ease of operation through automatic assessment and clear communication of results without requiring users to understand complex quality criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The comprehensive quality standards are implemented as automated self-service assessment functions within the mobile application. The system automatically evaluates images against established quality criteria and provides guidance to users, eliminating the need for manual quality checking and simplifying the user experience while maintaining high reliability standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11157731B2Systems and methods for assessing standards for mobile image quality
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 MITEK SYSTEMS INC
  • US11157731B2 patent drawing
  • US11157731B2 patent drawing
  • US11157731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for defining and determining a formal and verifiable mobile document image quality and usability (MDIQU) standard, or Standard for short. The Standard ensures that a mobile image can be used in an appropriate mobile document processing application, for example an application for mobile check deposit. In order to quantify the usability, the Standard establishes 5 quality and usability grades. A mobile image capture device can capture images. A mobile device can receive information associated with one or more image quality assurance (IQA) criteria; evaluating the images to select an image satisfying an image quality criteria based on the received information; and in response to the image satisfying the image quality score, sending the selected image to determine a set of image quality assurance (IQA) scores.