Mobile Lift Track for High-Density Storage Item Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern material handling systems face inefficiencies in resource utilization, leading to lower throughput and longer response times as they expand to accommodate more articles, ultimately becoming cost-prohibitive to maintain and requiring replacement of existing infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a vehicle with dual drive systems to navigate and interact with a moveable track, allowing horizontal and vertical movement to efficiently access and transfer items between the vehicle and storage locations within a storage assembly, optimizing the use of space and resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the capacity of existing automation infrastructure is incrementally expanded, then throughput and functionality are improved, but cost and complexity increase to the point of diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcomplexity of automation infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically reconfigurable storage assemblies where locations can be dynamically assigned to different product families or categories. The mobile robots dynamically adjust their routes and task assignments based on real-time inventory needs and order requirements, allowing the system to adapt flexibly without structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The automation system is designed with universal components that can serve multiple functions. The same robotic units handle both storage and retrieval operations, and the storage locations can be reassigned to different product types as needs change, eliminating the need for specialized infrastructure for different functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If the scale of inventory management system expands to accommodate more articles, then storage capacity is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of articlesVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where mobile robots autonomously navigate to retrieve items, and the control system automatically optimizes task allocation and routing. The robots self-coordinate to minimize travel time and maximize retrieval efficiency, maintaining high resource utilization even as the number of articles increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors system performance, inventory levels, and robot positions, using this feedback to dynamically optimize task allocation and routing decisions. This real-time feedback loop ensures that resource utilization remains efficient even as system scale expands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing infrastructure is replaced with completely new automation platform, then functionality and capacity are improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular components including independent mobile robots, discrete storage assemblies, and separable product families. This segmentation allows incremental implementation and expansion without requiring complete system replacement, reducing overall costs while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves enhanced functionality through parameter changes rather than structural changes. Storage location assignments, robot task parameters, and routing algorithms can be modified to adapt to new requirements without physical infrastructure changes, avoiding replacement costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11731834B2Material handling system
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 OPEX CORP
  • US11731834B2 patent drawing
  • US11731834B2 patent drawing
  • US11731834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a vehicle for delivering items and a moveable track that cooperates with the vehicle. The moveable track may cooperate with a storage system having storage locations for storing items. The vehicle may drive into the moveable track and lift the track using a vertical drive mechanism. The vehicle may include a horizontal drive system operable to drive the vehicle horizontally along the ground to carry the moveable track to a position adjacent the storage location. The vehicle may operate the vertical drive system to drop the moveable track adjacent the storage system. Additionally, the vehicle may operate the vertical drive to drive up the moveable track to an elevated position adjacent one of the storage locations in the storage system. The vehicle may include a transfer mechanism for transferring items between the vehicle and the storage location while the vehicle is in the elevated position.